The MIA syndrome is a well-established predictor of morbidity and mortality in hemodialysis patients, with its components—MIA—being interrelated. Our findings highlight significant differences in malnutrition and atherosclerosis parameters between patients using permcath and those using a fistula, suggesting that vascular access may play a role in the development of MIA syndrome. Specifically, none of the patients in the fistula group had hypoalbuminemia (serum albumin < 3.5 g/dL), while 20% of the permcath group exhibited hypoalbuminemia. This difference was statistically significant (P = 0.03). Hypoalbuminemia is a well-established marker of malnutrition and is strongly associated with increased morbidity and mortality in hemodialysis patients. The absence of hypoalbuminemia in the fistula group suggests that fistula use may contribute to improved nutritional status, potentially due to lower rates of infection and inflammation compared to permcath.
In terms of atherosclerosis, all patients in the fistula group had a CIMT ≤ 1 mm, while 30% of patients in the permcath group had a CIMT >1 mm, indicating subclinical atherosclerosis. This difference was statistically significant (P = 0.008). The CIMT is a reliable predictor of cardiovascular disease and mortality, and its elevation in the permcath group highlights the potential role of vascular access in promoting atherosclerotic changes. The higher prevalence of subclinical atherosclerosis in the permcath group may be attributed to the increased risk of systemic inflammation and endothelial dysfunction associated with catheter use.
Several studies have examined the impact of vascular access type on MIA in hemodialysis patients. However, direct comparisons between permcath and fistula use in the context of MIA syndrome remain limited. Our findings align with previous research highlighting the advantages of fistula-based dialysis in reducing malnutrition and atherosclerosis risks. Ravani et al. systematically reviewed the clinical outcomes associated with different vascular access types and found that catheter use was linked to the highest mortality and cardiovascular risk, whereas fistula use was associated with the most favorable outcomes. Our findings reinforce this, demonstrating that the permcath group exhibited significantly higher rates of malnutrition (as indicated by hypoalbuminemia, P = 0.03) and subclinical atherosclerosis (CIMT > 1 mm in 30% of permcath patients, P = 0.008), whereas these complications were absent in the fistula group (
5).
Similarly, Chiu et al. found that hypoalbuminemia was more prevalent in patients using permcath, and low albumin levels were strongly associated with increased mortality. These findings align with our observation that none of the fistula group had hypoalbuminemia, while 20% of the permcath group exhibited hypoalbuminemia (P = 0.03). Hypoalbuminemia is a well-recognized marker of malnutrition and inflammation, and its higher prevalence in the permcath group may be attributed to the increased risk of catheter-related infections and systemic inflammation (
6).
Elevated CIMT is a reliable predictor of subclinical atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. Patel et al. and Ravani et al. similarly reported that catheter use was associated with higher CIMT and an increased risk of cardiovascular events. This aligns with our observation that 30% of the permcath group had a CIMT > 1 mm, whereas none of the patients using a fistula exhibited this finding. The higher prevalence of subclinical atherosclerosis in permcath users may be attributed to chronic inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and oxidative stress associated with catheter use, factors that have been implicated in vascular disease progression (
5,
7).
Among kidney replacement modalities, hemodialysis is a common treatment in Iran and worldwide (
8,
9). Although AVF is the most optimal form of vascular access, the late presentation of patients and vascular disorders have led to an increase in the prevalence of permanent hemodialysis catheters for access in patients with ESRD (
10). Complications related to these catheters, especially blood infections, contribute to increased mortality and costs (
11). Management of MIA syndrome may improve the cardiovascular epidemic and poor outcomes in dialysis patients (
12). Several studies have investigated MIA syndrome in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis, but none have specifically addressed the role of vascular access in hemodialysis as a possible risk factor (
2,
12-
15). Considering the increased use of permanent catheters for hemodialysis in recent years, it is necessary to investigate this issue.
We found that all patients undergoing hemodialysis using a fistula had a CIMT ≤ 1 mm, while 30% of patients using a permanent catheter had a mean CIMT > 1 mm, indicating a significant difference between the two groups. The CIMT is a predictor of coronary heart disease and represents subclinical and asymptomatic atherosclerotic vascular diseases (
7). Healthy middle-aged adults with CIMT between 0.6 and 0.7 mm are considered normal, whereas a CIMT exceeding 1 mm is associated with a substantial risk of coronary heart disease (
16). Various risk factors related to CIMT levels include age (
17), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (
7), LDL and HDL levels (
7,
18-
20), blood urea, serum creatinine, hemoglobin levels, history of diabetes (
18), and magnesium levels (
21). We aimed to compare two similar groups in terms of risk factors to investigate the type of vascular access as a possible risk factor for increased CIMT. Consistent with our findings, a systematic review showed that individuals using catheters for hemodialysis had the highest risk of death and cardiovascular events compared to patients with other types of vascular access, with patients using fistulas exhibiting the lowest risk (
5).
Our findings also revealed that albumin levels were markedly lower in the group using permanent catheters. A study conducted in 2019, which aimed to compare mortality and morbidity between fistula and permanent catheter dialysis patients, also found that albumin levels were lower in the permanent catheter group, with low albumin levels associated with all-cause mortality (
6). This study is noteworthy, as the biochemical parameters of MIA syndrome in hemodialysis patients have not yet been documented in Iran. Additionally, it addresses an important gap in understanding which vascular access method is more favorable for patients undergoing hemodialysis. This study revealed that CIMT > 1 mm is more common and albumin levels are lower in the permanent catheter group. However, it had some limitations. Several parameters of MIA syndrome and early atherosclerosis, such as serum homocysteine, lipoprotein (a), physical activity, atherogenic diet, and inflammatory and prothrombotic muscle factors, could not be assessed due to budget constraints and the study design. Additionally, tests were only performed once due to insufficient funding, so studies with larger sample sizes and cohort designs examining all risk factors are suggested.
Central venous catheters, as one type of vascular access, have been well received by hemodialysis patients due to their simplicity of installation and immediate usability. Nevertheless, these forms of vascular access bear the highest rate of complications. We found that CIMT > 1 mm is more common and albumin levels are lower in the permanent catheter group, and both factors increase the risk of mortality due to cardiovascular events. Therefore, in addition to proper self-care training, hemodialysis patients should take appropriate measures to change from a permanent catheter to an AVF, which has fewer complications, as soon as possible.
The significant differences observed in malnutrition and atherosclerosis parameters between the permcath and fistula groups can be explained by several underlying mechanisms:
(1) Malnutrition and hypoalbuminemia: Hypoalbuminemia, a marker of malnutrition, was significantly more prevalent in the permcath group (20%) compared to the fistula group (0%). This finding aligns with previous studies linking permcath use to an increased risk of infection and systemic inflammation, which can lead to poor nutritional status (
12). Frequent infections associated with permcath use, such as catheter-related bloodstream infections, trigger a pro-inflammatory state characterized by the release of cytokines like interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). These cytokines promote protein catabolism and reduce albumin synthesis in the liver, leading to hypoalbuminemia. In contrast, AVF use is associated with a lower risk of infections and a more stable systemic inflammatory state, which may protect against malnutrition (
14). Additionally, chronic inflammation due to permcath use can impair appetite and nutrient absorption, further exacerbating malnutrition. The absence of hypoalbuminemia in the fistula group suggests that fistula use may help maintain better nutritional balance by minimizing infection-related inflammation and its metabolic consequences (
6).
(2) Atherosclerosis and elevated CIMT: The higher prevalence of subclinical atherosclerosis, as indicated by CIMT > 1 mm in the permcath group (30%) compared to none in the fistula group, may be attributed to the pro-inflammatory and pro-atherogenic effects of catheter use. Permcath insertion is associated with chronic endothelial injury and a persistent low-grade inflammatory state, both of which contribute to accelerated atherosclerotic changes (
16).
Chronic inflammation can promote endothelial dysfunction, characterized by reduced nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability and increased expression of adhesion molecules, such as vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1). These changes facilitate the recruitment of monocytes and the formation of atherosclerotic plaques. Furthermore, the presence of a catheter in the central venous system may lead to altered hemodynamics and increased shear stress, further contributing to vascular damage (
5,
7). Fistula use, on the other hand, is associated with better vascular health due to its reduced risk of infections and lower systemic inflammatory burden. Studies have shown that fistula use is linked to improved endothelial function and greater vascular stability compared to permcath.
(3) Systemic inflammation and its role: Although markers of inflammation (CRP, ESR, WBC, ferritin) did not differ significantly between the two groups in this study, it is important to note that inflammation is a dynamic process, and single-time measurements may not fully capture the chronic inflammatory burden. The higher prevalence of malnutrition and subclinical atherosclerosis in the permcath group likely reflects a cumulative inflammatory burden over time. Permcath use is associated with a higher risk of catheter-related infections, which trigger a persistent inflammatory state (
12). Pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 and TNF-α contribute to protein catabolism and reduced albumin synthesis, leading to hypoalbuminemia (
14). Interleukin-6 and TNF-α promote vascular inflammation and endothelial damage, accelerating atherosclerosis progression (
15). Additionally, the presence of a central venous catheter causes mechanical irritation and endothelial damage, leading to increased expression of adhesion molecules (VCAM-1, ICAM-1) (
13). Inflammatory mediators induce oxidative stress, reducing NO bioavailability, which impairs vasodilation and promotes vascular stiffness (
16). These findings support the role of vascular access type as a key determinant of nutritional and cardiovascular outcomes in hemodialysis patients.
(4) Clinical implications of vascular access: The observed differences in malnutrition and atherosclerosis parameters underscore the clinical importance of vascular access type in hemodialysis patients. Permcath use, while convenient and immediately functional, is associated with higher rates of complications, including infections, inflammation, and cardiovascular events. In contrast, fistula use is associated with better long-term outcomes, including improved nutritional status and reduced risk of atherosclerosis. These findings highlight the need to prioritize fistula creation in eligible patients and to implement targeted interventions to mitigate the risks associated with permcath use in patients who are not candidates for fistula (
5,
11).
5.1. Conclusions
This study highlights the clinical significance of vascular access type in hemodialysis patients, demonstrating that fistula use is associated with better outcomes in terms of malnutrition and subclinical atherosclerosis compared to permcath. Specifically, the absence of hypoalbuminemia and lower prevalence of elevated CIMT among fistula users underscore its protective role against malnutrition and cardiovascular risks, likely due to reduced infection and inflammation rates. These findings support the prioritization of fistula creation in eligible patients to improve nutritional status, minimize cardiovascular risk, and enhance overall outcomes. However, this study is not without limitations, including its small sample size, cross-sectional design, and the use of single-time measurements for biochemical and clinical parameters. These factors limit the generalizability of the results and the ability to establish causality. Future studies should investigate the long-term effects of vascular access type on cardiovascular outcomes, including mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke. Additionally, examining inflammatory markers such as IL-6 and TNF-α could provide insights into the role of chronic inflammation in MIA syndrome. Longitudinal studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these findings and establish causality.
5.2. Limitations
This study has several limitations that should be acknowledged. First, the small sample size of 40 patients limits the generalizability of the findings and reduces statistical power for subgroup analyses. Second, the cross-sectional design restricts the ability to establish causal relationships between vascular access type and the observed differences in malnutrition and atherosclerosis. Third, the parameters of MIA were assessed at a single time point, which may not fully capture the chronic and dynamic nature of these processes. Additionally, certain markers of MIA syndrome, such as IL-6, TNF-α, and homocysteine, were not included due to resource constraints. Finally, the study was conducted in a specific geographic region using convenience sampling, which may limit the broader applicability of the results. Future studies with larger cohorts, longitudinal designs, and more comprehensive assessments are recommended to validate and expand upon these findings. This study is also limited by the absence of key inflammatory biomarkers such as IL-6 and TNF-α, which could provide a deeper understanding of inflammation-related malnutrition and atherosclerosis. Additionally, all biochemical and clinical parameters were measured only once, preventing the assessment of dynamic changes over time. Future studies should incorporate longitudinal measurements and additional biomarkers to better characterize the impact of vascular access on MIA syndrome.