The present findings showed that intraperitoneal injection of PQT at 4 mg/kg (three times a day for one week) impaired the rats’ memory, balance, and motor performance. On the other hand, administration of DM before PQT injection improved the memory, balance, and motor coordination of rats, while reducing the MDA content of hippocampal tissues in comparison with the PQT group.
PQT preferentially affects the nigrostriatal pathway, although it is known to accumulate in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus (
19). A study by Chen et al. (
5), revealed that the hippocampus was damaged by PQT through oxidative stress. In addition, damage was associated with the mitochondrial dysfunction of hippocampal neurons, which is attributed to mtDNA oxidative damage; consequently, learning and memory might be affected in rats (
4). In the present study, spatial memory test and passive avoidance test (PAT) were carried out for evaluating memory function. We initially used the rotarod test for evaluating motor function and determining DM potential to prevent changes in memory and learning due to PQT treatment.
Based on our results, administration of PQT induced memory impairment in rats, which is in accordance with previous findings (
4). Moreover, cognitive disorders were assessed in rats using PAT. The animals received electric shocks in the first trial as soon as they entered the dark compartment. Generally, avoidance of entrance into the dark chamber indicated the learning and memory ability of animals (
20). In our study, intraperitoneal administration of PQT at 4 mg/kg three times a day for one week before the acquisition trial caused a significant reduction in retention latency and impaired learning and memory.
In order to examine memory deficits in cases of hippocampal dysfunction, spatial and learning memory tests were applied. Overall, latency time to find the hidden platform is related to the application of information stored during trail training. Consistent with previous findings, PQT treatment prior to the acquisition trial increased the latency time and caused cognitive deficits in our study (
14). On the other hand, DM pretreatment caused a significant reduction in the latency time of the retention trial in the mentioned tests.
DM, with potential antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-lipid peroxidation activities, is isolated from different plants (
21,
22). In previous reports, the effective role of DM in neuroprotection has been confirmed. In this regard, Sawmiller et al., reported that DM significantly decreased the level of Aβ and Aβ soluble oligomers, besides tau hyperphosphorylation in Alzheimer’s disease. Moreover, they reported that DM decreased neuroinflammation and cognitive damage in AD (
23).
Furthermore, in ischemia/reperfusion damage, DM exhibits neuroprotective and antiapoptotic effects through activation of JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway. In multiple studies, this signaling pathway has been suggested to account for the neuroprotective effects of DM (at least partly). In addition, it is involved in various neuron-specific CNS functions, including cell inflammation, proliferation, survival, and differentiation (
24).
Additionally, DM may exhibit potential antiapoptotic activities in cerebral I/R rats by reducing DNA fragmentation and improving cell survival via Bax downregulation and Bcl-2 upregulation (
24). Based on previous studies, DM prevents cerebral I/R by ameliorating neurological deficits, infarcted area, and brain edema by preventing venular protein leakage and post-ischemic adhesion/migration of leukocytes in mice (
25). In our study, behavioral findings indicated that different DM doses could alleviate memory disorders, which is in line with previous research (
13).
In conclusion, DM injection prior to PQT administration could improve the motor functions and memory (spatial and passive avoidance memory) or rats and reduce the hippocampal MDA concentration induced by PQT. However, further research is necessary to determine the neuroprotective mechanism of DM.