https://doi.org/10.5812/jme-120008

Effect of Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy on Subjective Well-being and Psychological Distress of Kerman University of Medical Sciences Students

authors:

avatar Zohreh Shahsavari Googhari ORCID 1 , avatar Fariba Hafezi ORCID 1 , * , avatar Parviz Asgari ORCID 1 , avatar Alireza Heidari ORCID 1

Department of Psychology, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran
Journal of Medical Education: Vol.21, issue 1; e120008
published online: May 15, 2022
article type: Research Article
received: October 2, 2021
revised: January 29, 2022
accepted: February 22, 2022

how to cite: Shahsavari Googhari Z , Hafezi F , Asgari P , Heidari A . Effect of Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy on Subjective Well-being and Psychological Distress of Kerman University of Medical Sciences Students. J Med Edu. 2022;21(1):e120008. https://doi.org/10.5812/jme-120008.

Abstract

Background:

Mental health is a significant component of academic achievement, while psychological distress can reduce academic performance.

Objectives:

The present study aimed to investigate the effect of Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) on subjective well-being and psychological distress of Kerman University of Medical Sciences students.

Methods:

In this quasi-experimental study, the study population included all Kerman University of Medical Sciences students in 2020. The study sample consisted of 30 university students randomly divided into two groups: Control (n = 15) and experimental (n = 15), using convenience sampling. The experimental group received eight 90-minute MBCT sessions biweekly. The research tools included the Subjective Well-being Scale (SWS) and the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21). The data were analyzed with SPSS version 22.

Results:

The mean posttest scores of emotional, psychological, and social well-being were 3.56 ± 0.31, 4.46 ± 0.32, and 5.70 ± 0.42 in the experimental group and 2.64 ± 0.40, 4.00 ± 0.37, and 3.11 ± 0.35 in the control group, respectively. Moreover, the mean posttest scores for depression, anxiety, and stress were 1.64 ± 0.16, 1.19 ± 0.41, and 1.67 ± 0.15 in the experimental group and 3.10 ± 0.24, 3.55 ± 0.52, and 3.01 ± 0.24 in the control group, respectively. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy significantly improved the posttest scores of subjective well-being subscales (emotional, psychological, and social well-being). Moreover, depression, anxiety, and stress decreased significantly in the experimental group (P < 0.001).

Conclusions:

Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy effectively reduced psychological distress and improved subjective well-being in university students.

1. Background

Human success and progress depend on rich, dynamic, and effective thoughts (1). Mental health strongly correlates with academic achievement; therefore, students need mental health and academic success to develop such constructive competencies and academic and social achievement (2, 3). Some factors, including subjective well-being, influence students' mental health. In fact, the identification and examination of factors contributing to well-being are the top priorities of the education system, and well-being promotion is a principal task of educational managers and experts (4, 5).

According to novel approaches to health, the absence of illness does not ensure a sense of health; instead, health is also characterized by life satisfaction, positive mood, and effective communication with others (6, 7). Influenced by positive psychology concepts, health researchers have adopted a different theoretical and research approach to explaining and studying well-being and have conceptualized this concept in the form of subjective well-being (8, 9). That is why mental health approaches and methods, including examining subjective well-being, have recently gained momentum (10).

As the capacity of discovering all ones' aptitude, subjective well-being is the outcome of a balance between positive and negative affects, job satisfaction, and overall life satisfaction (11). Those with high well-being experience more positive emotions have a positive attitude towards themselves and current and future events, positively evaluate these components, and describe them as pleasant. On the other hand, those with low well-being experience more negative emotions towards these components (12). Overall, well-being indicates integrity in one's life, emotional balance, and overall life satisfaction. People with optimal well-being have more pleasant experiences and suffer fewer unpleasant feelings (13, 14).

Students' performance is also affected by psychological distress (15). According to Tang et al. (16), by disrupting cognitive processing, psychological distress can harm self-efficacy and self-esteem and even lead to suicidal ideation. Psychological distress is a specific emotional state and condition experienced temporarily or constantly in response to specific stressors and harmful demands. It encompasses unpleasant depressive and anxious mental states, with physiological and emotional symptoms that reduce distress tolerance and increase maladjusted behaviors (17, 18).

Some studies have mentioned specific mechanisms to change the level of psychological distress (19). Mindfulness is a widely discussed trait pertaining to well-being promotion and distress alleviation, defined as a unique state of awareness providing interaction with the present moment and living in the moment (20, 21). The elements of mindfulness, ie, awareness and non-judgmental acceptance, are an antidote to common psychological distresses. In studies examining the effects of mindfulness-based interventions on cognitive-emotional processes, individuals experiencing distress have stated the effectiveness of mindfulness through alleviating rumination, enhancing mental clarity, and promoting optimal thoughts and emotions (22, 23). According to previous studies, mindfulness training positively affects some psychological characteristics, including symptoms of depression and anxiety, sleep quality, life quality, depression, and anger (24-27).

Trombka et al. (24) showed that mindfulness-based health promotion was feasible and efficacious to improve life quality, depression, and anxiety symptoms among Brazilian officers; these results were maintained after six months (24). Serpa et al. (27) reported significant reductions in anxiety, depression, and suicidal ideation after mindfulness-based stress reduction training in veterans. Also, they reported that mindfulness interacted with other outcomes, such that increases in mindfulness were related to improvements in anxiety, depression, and mental health functionality (27). According to Adelian et al. (28), mindfulness-based therapy effectively increased women’s resilience. MacKenzie and Kocovski (29) showed that mindfulness-based cognitive therapy significantly decreased depression and anxiety. Furthermore, according to Amick et al. (30), mindfulness-based cognitive therapy was as effective as pharmacotherapy in controlling depressive symptoms. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy teaches people to be aware of their thoughts in a non-judgmental manner and accept positive or, at least, neutral thoughts as reality instead of automatic negative thoughts.

2. Objectives

This study intended to determine whether mindfulness-based cognitive therapy significantly affects female students' subjective well-being and psychological distress. Accordingly, the present study aimed to investigate the effect of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy on the subjective well-being and psychological distress of students at Kerman University of Medical Sciences.

3. Methods

This quasi-experimental study utilized a pretest-posttest design with a control group. The study population comprised all students at Kerman University of Medical Sciences in 2020. The study sample consisted of 30 university students randomly divided into two groups: Control (n = 15) and experimental (n = 15), using convenience sampling. The inclusion criteria were having a subjective well-being score lower than the cutoff value, having a depression, anxiety, and stress (psychological distress) score above the cutoff value, and informed consent to attend all sessions. On the other hand, the exclusion criteria included lack of cooperation, failure to meet the cutoff scores on both scales, and absence from more than two sessions. The researchers obtained the written consent of the participants in response to ethical concerns. This article was extracted from a Ph.D. dissertation by Zohreh Shahsavari Googhari in the Department of Psychology, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran (Ethics Code: IR.IAU.AHVAZ.REC.1399.037). Part of this project has already been published (31).

3.1. Instruments

3.1.1. Subjective Well-being Scale

Keyes and Magyar-Moe (2003) developed the 45-item Subjective Well-being Scale (SWS), which includes three subscales: Emotional (12 items), psychological (18 items), and social well-being (15 items), each with a unique raw score. Emotional well-being items are scored on a scale of 0 to 4, whereas psychosocial and social well-being items are scored on a scale of 1 to 7. Higher overall scores suggest a higher level of subjective happiness (32). According to the authors, the tool's reliability was 0.77 (33). Cronbach's alpha for the scale in the current study was 0.80.

3.1.2. Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21

Lovibond and Lovibond developed the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) for psychological distress screening in 1995. The original form has 42 statements and assesses the following mental constructs: Anxiety, stress, and depression, each with 14 statements. Each factor/mental construct is measured by seven statements in the short form (34). Sahebi et al. (35) sought to validate a 21-item questionnaire for the Iranian population. Cronbach's alpha for the scale in the current study was 0.97.

3.2. Procedure

All the participants filled out the SWS and DASS-21 on the pretest. Then, the experimental group received mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, while the control group received no intervention. On the posttest after the intervention, all the participants filled out SWS and DASS-21 again.

3.3. Intervention Program

The experimental group underwent the mindfulness-based cognitive therapy program in eight 90-minute sessions (twice a week). Table 1 presents a summary of the sessions.

Table 1.

A Summary of Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy Sessions (36)

SessionA Summary of the Session Content
1Establishing a therapeutic relationship and getting consent
2Presenting a novel therapeutic conversation, handling automatic thoughts, training three-minute breathing space, mindful walking, and using mindfulness to cope with negative emotions
3Out out depressed brain function and how mindfulness affects it, problem objectification, brain training, training certain everyday mindfulness activities
4Acceptance, using metaphors, automatic thoughts, depression criteria, depression definition and diagnosis, three-minute breathing space, plus review
5You are not your thoughts, beliefs, and feelings, goal-setting, body scan mindfulness
6Liberation through forgiveness: liberation mindfulness training, self-value promotion
7Being friends and kind with yourself and others, building a healthy relationship with yourself, mindful listening to make your relationships better
8Thanksgiving, patience, change, and reflection; regular practice

3.4. Statistical Analyses

The data were analyzed via a one-way analysis of covariance. The assumptions of this test, including the normality of the covariate and dependent variable, the linear relationship between the covariate and dependent variable in the experimental and control groups, and the homogeneity of the regression line slopes among the covariates, were first examined. The data were analyzed with SPSS version 22.

4. Results

The participants included 30 students at Kerman University of Medical Sciences, aged 21.67 ± 3.42 years old. The two groups’ mean pretest scores did not significantly differ, but the mean posttest scores of subjective well-being (emotional, psychological, and social well-being) were higher in the experimental than in the control group. Furthermore, the mean posttest scores of psychological distress (depression, anxiety, and stress) were lower in the experimental group than in the control group (Table 2).

Table 2.

Mean and Standard Deviation (SD) of Variables in Experimental and Control Groups

VariablesSubscalePhasesMindfulness-based Cognitive TherapyControlP-Value
Subjective well-beingEmotional well-beingPretest2.22 ± 0.452.51 ± 0.490.379
Posttest3.56 ± 0.312.64 ± 0.400.001
Psychological well-beingPretest3.67 ± 0.353.93 ± 0.280.419
Posttest4.46 ± 0.324.00 ± 0.370.001
Social well-beingPretest3.19 ± 0.493.24 ± 0.600.831
Posttest5.70 ± 0.423.11 ± 0.350.001
Psychological distressDepressionPretest3.42 ± 0.283.13 ± 0.180.254
Posttest1.64 ± 0.163.10 ± 0.240.001
AnxietyPretest3.94 ± 0.423.67 ± 0.640.368
Posttest1.19 ± 0.413.55 ± 0.520.001
StressPretest3.24 ± 0.153.31 ± 0.170.716
Posttest1.67 ± 0.153.01 ± 0.240.001

A multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy on the students’ subjective well-being and psychological distress. Levene’s test results confirmed the assumption of the homogeneity of variances for subjective well-being and psychological distress. A Kolmogorov-Smirnov test also confirmed the assumption of the normal distribution of the two groups’ subjective well-being and psychological distress pre and posttest scores. The F index for the group x pretest variations was non-significant for all the variables; no heterogeneity of regression was observed; thus, the null hypothesis of the homogeneity of the regression slopes of both groups was confirmed.

An analysis of covariance was performed to examine the groups’ possible significant effects on the dependent variables. After controlling for the pretest scores, there was a significant difference between the control and experimental groups in at least one dependent variable, confirming mindfulness-based cognitive therapy's effectiveness (F = 7.99, P < 0.001). Based on the eta-squared, the magnitude of effect/difference was 0.51; ie, 51% of the individual variations on posttest scores were due to the effect of the intervention (Table 3).

Table 3.

Results of Multivariate Analysis of Covariance on Posttest Scores of Research Variables in Experimental and Control Groups

EffectValuedfError dfFP-Valueη2Power
Pillais trace0.513237.99< 0.0010.511.00

Next, the possible significant differences between the two groups regarding subjective well-being and psychological distress were examined. Table 4 lists the results of between-group effects for these two variables. The experimental and control groups significantly differed in terms of emotional well-being (F = 105.62), psychological well-being (F= 108.48), and social well-being (F = 115.61), thereby confirming the effects of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy on all the dimensions of subjective well-being. In addition, the results showed that the experimental and control groups significantly differed in terms of depression (F = 111.21), anxiety (F = 96.89), and stress (F= 129.17), thereby confirming the effects of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy on all the dimensions of psychological distress.

Table 4.

Results of One-way Analysis of Covariance on Study Variables in Experimental and Control Groups

Variables, SourceSSdfMSFPη2Power
Emotional well-being
Pretest170.841170.84105.62< 0.0010.501.00
Group16.19116.194.180.040.340.95
Error31.48271.58
Psychological well-being
Pretest280.031280.03108.48< 0.0010.801.00
Group12.39112.394.800.030.150.56
Error69.69272.58
Social well-being
Pretest192.541192.54115.61< 0.0010.681.00
Group10.40110.404.390.010.140.59
Error58.96273.07
Depression
Pretest195.441195.44111.21< 0.0010.631.00
Group12.01112.014.920.030.490.83
Error42.1427
Anxiety
Pretest173.211173.2196.89< 0.0010.791.00
Group9.8819.884.090.0010.520.66
Error52.6027
Stress
Pretest182.511182.51129.17< 0.0010.811.00
Group13.13113.135.710.020.400.89
Error76.6927

5. Discussion

This study aimed to investigate the effect of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy on subjective well-being and psychological distress of Kerman University of Medical Sciences students in 2020. Based on the findings, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy promoted the students’ subjective well-being and alleviated their psychological distress. This finding is consistent with the results of Hofmann and Gomez (37), Tickell et al. (38), and Sado et al. (39).

These findings can be explained by the positive effect of mindfulness on well-being. Myers (40) showed that mindfulness significantly predicts life satisfaction, and mindfulness training therapy promotes well-being. Mindfulness makes people resilient and adaptive against stressful and difficult situations by enhancing life satisfaction and reducing psychological distress.

Mindfulness is a crucial component of liberation because it effectively reduces both internal and external pressures, which are seen as the root of many psychological disorders in this perspective (41). Mindfulness teaches students how to find peace and happiness within themselves and incorporate peace and happiness into their daily lives, thereby improving their overall well-being. Otherwise stated, mindfulness allows students to focus on the present instead of the past or future (42). Mindfulness produces an accepting, flexible mindset instead of avoiding and consequently protracting distressing emotions and stressors. It helps mitigate pain and suffering, suppresses unpleasant internal stimulants, and thus promotes proper behavior in response to deviations. Mindfulness enhancement reduces negative behaviors and improves well-being (19).

Mindfulness directly impacts mental health because it allows people to fully experience each moment, improving their sense of reality. Students can use mindfulness techniques to identify situations that cause them to feel depressed, anxious, or stressed, and then gradually let go of their anxiety, worries, fatigue, dissatisfaction, or depression (43). Mindfulness is a significant prerequisite for liberation because it effectively reduces internal and external pressures, which are seen as the root of various psychological disorders in this approach (25). Mindfulness teaches students how to find peace and happiness within themselves and how to incorporate peace and happiness into their daily lives, improving their overall well-being.

By balancing human awareness, mindfulness promotes intra- and inter-personal relationships, helps people better deal with and challenge their psychological distress, and creates proper subjective well-being by interacting with positive thoughts about themselves and others. Promoting well-being mitigates distress and disquiet and helps people deal with them more rationally (44).

Some factors limited this study. The sample comprised only female students in Kerman, and thus the results should be generalized to male students and students in other cities with caution. To overcome these limitations, future studies should also recruit male students from other cities. Based on the findings and the role of mindfulness, mindfulness training classes can be held for students to promote their well-being and mental health.

References

  • 1.

    Braveman P, Gottlieb L. The social determinants of health: it's time to consider the causes of the causes. Public Health Rep. 2014;129 Suppl 2:19-31. [PubMed ID: 24385661]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3863696]. https://doi.org/10.1177/00333549141291S206.

  • 2.

    Chang F, Jiang Y, Loyalka P, Chu J, Shi Y, Osborn A, et al. Parental migration, educational achievement, and mental health of junior high school students in rural China. China Econ Rev. 2019;54:337-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2019.01.007.

  • 3.

    Hernandez-Torrano D, Ibrayeva L, Sparks J, Lim N, Clementi A, Almukhambetova A, et al. Mental Health and Well-Being of University Students: A Bibliometric Mapping of the Literature. Front Psychol. 2020;11:1226. [PubMed ID: 32581976]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7296142]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01226.

  • 4.

    Park SY, Andalibi N, Zou Y, Ambulkar S, Huh-Yoo J. Understanding Students' Mental Well-Being Challenges on a University Campus: Interview Study. JMIR Form Res. 2020;4(3). e15962. [PubMed ID: 32134393]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7082737]. https://doi.org/10.2196/15962.

  • 5.

    Morales-Rodriguez FM, Espigares-Lopez I, Brown T, Perez-Marmol JM. The Relationship between Psychological Well-Being and Psychosocial Factors in University Students. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(13). [PubMed ID: 32630816]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7369745]. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134778.

  • 6.

    Galderisi S, Heinz A, Kastrup M, Beezhold J, Sartorius N. Toward a new definition of mental health. World Psychiatry. 2015;14(2):231-3. [PubMed ID: 26043341]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4471980]. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20231.

  • 7.

    Szczesniak M, Tulecka M. Family Functioning and Life Satisfaction: The Mediatory Role of Emotional Intelligence. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2020;13:223-32. [PubMed ID: 32184683]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7061410]. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S240898.

  • 8.

    Satici B. Testing a model of subjective well-being: The roles of optimism, psychological vulnerability, and shyness. Health Psychol Open. 2019;6(2):2055102919884290. [PubMed ID: 31666980]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6801894]. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055102919884290.

  • 9.

    Medvedev ON, Landhuis CE. Exploring constructs of well-being, happiness and quality of life. PeerJ. 2018;6. e4903. [PubMed ID: 29876148]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5985772]. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4903.

  • 10.

    Machado L, de Oliveira IR, Peregrino A, Cantilino A. Common mental disorders and subjective well-being: Emotional training among medical students based on positive psychology. PLoS One. 2019;14(2). e0211926. [PubMed ID: 30731006]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6366695]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211926.

  • 11.

    Weziak-Bialowolska D, Bialowolski P, Sacco PL, VanderWeele TJ, McNeely E. Well-Being in Life and Well-Being at Work: Which Comes First? Evidence From a Longitudinal Study. Front Public Health. 2020;8:103. [PubMed ID: 32328472]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7160299]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00103.

  • 12.

    Guse T, Vescovelli F, Croxford S. Subjective Well-Being and Gratitude Among South African Adolescents: Exploring Gender and Cultural Differences. Youth Soc. 2019;51(5):591-615. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118x17697237.

  • 13.

    Unanue W, Gomez ME, Cortez D, Oyanedel JC, Mendiburo-Seguel A. Revisiting the Link between Job Satisfaction and Life Satisfaction: The Role of Basic Psychological Needs. Front Psychol. 2017;8:680. [PubMed ID: 28536541]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5423407]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00680.

  • 14.

    Diener E, Lucas RE, Oishi S. Advances and Open Questions in the Science of Subjective Well-Being. Collabra Psychol. 2018;4(1). [PubMed ID: 30637366]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6329388]. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.115.

  • 15.

    Fradelos EC, Kapsiocha E, Tzavella F, Kastanidou S, Tsaras K, Papagiannis D, et al. Factors Associated with Psychological Distress in University Students and the Relation to Emotional Intelligent and Spirituality: a Cross-sectional Study. Mater Sociomed. 2019;31(4):262-7. [PubMed ID: 32082090]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7007606]. https://doi.org/10.5455/msm.2019.31.262-267.

  • 16.

    Tang F, Byrne M, Qin P. Psychological distress and risk for suicidal behavior among university students in contemporary China. J Affect Disord. 2018;228:101-8. [PubMed ID: 29245090]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.12.005.

  • 17.

    Goger P, Rozenman M, Gonzalez A. The association between current maternal psychological control, anxiety symptoms, and emotional regulatory processes in emerging adults. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2020;68:101563. [PubMed ID: 32145580]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7214129]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2020.101563.

  • 18.

    Grotan K, Sund ER, Bjerkeset O. Mental Health, Academic Self-Efficacy and Study Progress Among College Students - The SHoT Study, Norway. Front Psychol. 2019;10:45. [PubMed ID: 30733694]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6354661]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00045.

  • 19.

    McDonald HM, Sherman KA, Petocz P, Kangas M, Grant K, Kasparian NA. Mindfulness and the Experience of Psychological Distress: the Mediating Effects of Emotion Regulation and Attachment Anxiety. Mindfulness. 2016;7(4):799-808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-016-0517-9.

  • 20.

    Janssen M, Heerkens Y, Kuijer W, van der Heijden B, Engels J. Effects of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction on employees' mental health: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2018;13(1). e0191332. [PubMed ID: 29364935]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5783379]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191332.

  • 21.

    Galante J, Friedrich C, Dawson AF, Modrego-Alarcon M, Gebbing P, Delgado-Suarez I, et al. Mindfulness-based programmes for mental health promotion in adults in nonclinical settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. PLoS Med. 2021;18(1). e1003481. [PubMed ID: 33428616]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7799763]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003481.

  • 22.

    Kriakous SA, Elliott KA, Lamers C, Owen R. The Effectiveness of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction on the Psychological Functioning of Healthcare Professionals: a Systematic Review. Mindfulness (N Y). 2021;12(1):1-28. [PubMed ID: 32989406]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7511255]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-020-01500-9.

  • 23.

    Scheepers RA, Emke H, Epstein RM, Lombarts K. The impact of mindfulness-based interventions on doctors' well-being and performance: A systematic review. Med Educ. 2020;54(2):138-49. [PubMed ID: 31868262]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7003865]. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14020.

  • 24.

    Trombka M, Demarzo M, Campos D, Antonio SB, Cicuto K, Walcher AL, et al. Mindfulness Training Improves Quality of Life and Reduces Depression and Anxiety Symptoms Among Police Officers: Results From the POLICE Study-A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:624876. [PubMed ID: 33716824]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7952984]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.624876.

  • 25.

    Wielgosz J, Goldberg SB, Kral TRA, Dunne JD, Davidson RJ. Mindfulness Meditation and Psychopathology. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2019;15:285-316. [PubMed ID: 30525995]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6597263]. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093423.

  • 26.

    Chi X, Bo A, Liu T, Zhang P, Chi I. Effects of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction on Depression in Adolescents and Young Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Psychol. 2018;9:1034. [PubMed ID: 29977221]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6021542]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01034.

  • 27.

    Serpa JG, Taylor SL, Tillisch K. Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) reduces anxiety, depression, and suicidal ideation in veterans. Med Care. 2014;52(12 Suppl 5):S19-24. [PubMed ID: 25397818]. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000000202.

  • 28.

    Adelian H, Khodabandeh Shahraki S, Miri S, Farokhzadian J. The effect of mindfulness-based stress reduction on resilience of vulnerable women at drop-in centers in the southeast of Iran. BMC Womens Health. 2021;21(1):255. [PubMed ID: 34167523]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8222952]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01390-6.

  • 29.

    MacKenzie MB, Kocovski NL. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression: trends and developments. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2016;9:125-32. [PubMed ID: 27274325]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4876939]. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S63949.

  • 30.

    Amick HR, Gartlehner G, Gaynes BN, Forneris C, Asher GN, Morgan LC, et al. Comparative benefits and harms of second generation antidepressants and cognitive behavioral therapies in initial treatment of major depressive disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2015;351:h6019. [PubMed ID: 26645251]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4673103]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h6019.

  • 31.

    Shahsavari Googhari Z, Hafezi F, Asgari P, Heidari A. The effectiveness of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and acceptance and commitment therapy on medical science students’ subjective well-being, psychological distress, and emotion regulation. J Shahrekord Univ Med Sci. 2022;24(1):35-41. https://doi.org/10.34172/jsums.2022.07.

  • 32.

    Krueger AB, Schkade DA. The Reliability of Subjective Well-Being Measures. J Public Econ. 2008;92(8-9):1833-45. [PubMed ID: 19649136]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2597879]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.12.015.

  • 33.

    Delavar A, Asadi R. Use of Partial Least Square Structural Equation Modeling in Explanation of Demographic Variables Effect on Spiritual Intelligence with the Mediating of Well-Being. Train Measure. 2016;6(22):1-39.

  • 34.

    Beaufort IN, De Weert-Van Oene GH, Buwalda VAJ, de Leeuw JRJ, Goudriaan AE. The Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) as a Screener for Depression in Substance Use Disorder Inpatients: A Pilot Study. Eur Addict Res. 2017;23(5):260-8. [PubMed ID: 29224000]. https://doi.org/10.1159/000485182.

  • 35.

    Sahebi A, Asghari MJ, Salari RS. Validation of depression anxiety and stress scale (DASS-21) for an Iranian population. Dev Psychol. 2005;1(4):36-54.

  • 36.

    Williams JM, Russell I, Russell D. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy: further issues in current evidence and future research. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2008;76(3):524-9. [PubMed ID: 18540746]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2834575]. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.76.3.524.

  • 37.

    Gomez AF, Hofmann SG. Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Anxiety and Depression. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2017;40(4):739-49. [PubMed ID: 29080597]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5679245]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psc.2017.08.008.

  • 38.

    Tickell A, Ball S, Bernard P, Kuyken W, Marx R, Pack S, et al. The Effectiveness of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) in Real-World Healthcare Services. Mindfulness (N Y). 2020;11(2):279-90. [PubMed ID: 32064009]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6995449]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-018-1087-9.

  • 39.

    Sado M, Kosugi T, Ninomiya A, Nagaoka M, Park S, Fujisawa D, et al. Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Improving Subjective Well-Being Among Healthy Individuals: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2020;9(5). e15892. [PubMed ID: 32005642]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7244996]. https://doi.org/10.2196/15892.

  • 40.

    Myers RE. Cultivating Mindfulness to Promote Self-Care and Well-Being in Perioperative Nurses. AORN J. 2017;105(3):259-66. [PubMed ID: 28241947]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aorn.2017.01.005.

  • 41.

    Parsons CE, Crane C, Parsons LJ, Fjorback LO, Kuyken W. Home practice in Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy and Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of participants' mindfulness practice and its association with outcomes. Behav Res Ther. 2017;95:29-41. [PubMed ID: 28527330]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5501725]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2017.05.004.

  • 42.

    Kosugi T, Ninomiya A, Nagaoka M, Hashimoto Z, Sawada K, Park S, et al. Effectiveness of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Improving Subjective and Eudaimonic Well-Being in Healthy Individuals: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Front Psychol. 2021;12:700916. [PubMed ID: 34539498]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8441176]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.700916.

  • 43.

    Parmentier FBR, Garcia-Toro M, Garcia-Campayo J, Yanez AM, Andres P, Gili M. Mindfulness and Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety in the General Population: The Mediating Roles of Worry, Rumination, Reappraisal and Suppression. Front Psychol. 2019;10:506. [PubMed ID: 30906276]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6418017]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00506.

  • 44.

    Walsh KM, Saab BJ, Farb NA. Effects of a Mindfulness Meditation App on Subjective Well-Being: Active Randomized Controlled Trial and Experience Sampling Study. JMIR Ment Health. 2019;6(1). e10844. [PubMed ID: 30622094]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6329416]. https://doi.org/10.2196/10844.