The horizontal transfer of resistance genes via integrons is one of the main routes of antibiotic resistance. The integrons are MGEs carrying gene cassettes that can spread the isolates of MDR and subsequently restrict treatment options to control bacterial infections (
4,
17). The presence of these elements, especially class I integrons, is one of the reasons for the emergence of MDR isolates (
18). The frequency of class I and II integrons in this study was found as 47.7% and 17.4%, respectively. The results of other investigations also indicated the higher frequency of class I than class II integrons (
4,
11), which are in line with the findings of the present study. Mostafa et al. similarly reported the high frequency of class I (72.6%) than class II (35.2%) integrons (
4). In another study, the frequency of class I and II integrons was reported to be 92.68% and 7.31%, respectively (
16). In two investigations conducted abroad, the frequency of class I integrons was reported as 56% and 42.5% (
11,
19). There was also a statistically significant correlation between integron-positive isolates and resistance to certain antibiotics, especially aminoglycosides, rifampin, and clindamycin, which were similar to the results of other investigations (
4,
16). In a study in China in 2018, all integron-positive
S. aureus isolates were resistant to aminoglycoside (
20). Besides, Xu et al. observed a relationship between the presence of class I integron and resistance to gentamicin, erythromycin, tetracycline, and cotrimoxazole (
21), indicating the presence of different gene cassettes on integrons and thus the involvement of integrons in the occurrence of antibiotic resistance in these isolates. The available results demonstrated the role of these MGEs in the transfer and spreading of various drug resistance patterns (
22). Nowadays, the high prevalence of antibiotic resistance among bacterial pathogens is one of the most important public healthcare concerns. In our study, all
S. aureus isolates were resistant to penicillin (100%), which was similar to the results of other investigations (
23-
25). Besides, there was a high resistance rate to gentamicin (80%), amikacin (52%), and clindamycin (50%). The rates of resistance were significantly higher in MRSA isolates than in MSSA isolates, especially to aminoglycosides and clindamycin. Moreover, Safari et al. underlined the high levels of resistance in
S. aureus isolates to gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, and clindamycin, which was consistent with the results of the present study (
16). The rates of resistance to gentamicin (90.5%), clindamycin (87.5%), rifampin (71.8%), tobramycin, and ciprofloxacin (84.3%) in
S. aureus isolates were higher in another investigation (
26) than in the present study. The highest susceptibility of isolates was to vancomycin (100%) and linezolid (96.5%). In most investigations, similar to the present study, all
S. aureus isolates were reported as sensitive to vancomycin (
12,
26,
27). In this study, 3.5% of the isolates were resistant to linezolid. In an investigation by Goudarzi et al., none of the
S. aureus isolates was resistant to this antibiotic (
12), but Mostafa et al. reported that 17.3% of the isolates were resistant to linezolid (
4). In a study by Poorabbas et al., the lowest resistance rates were to cotrimoxazole and gentamicin (42%), ciprofloxacin (34%), clindamycin (24%), and rifampin (10%) while in the present study, the lowest resistance was to vancomycin (0%) and linezolid (2%) (
10). In various investigations, the frequency of MDR
S. aureus isolates was reported from 75.8% to 100% (
6,
23,
28), which was in agreement with the results of this study with a prevalence of 93.1% in our isolates. In general, the antibiotic resistance rate of
S. aureus isolates to some antibiotics in this study was lower than that reported in some other investigations, which could be due to regional differences, the low number of MRSA isolates, the type of samples examined, and differences in the consumption patterns of antibiotics, among others (
25-
27).