1. Background
2. Methods
2.1. Biochemical Analyses
2.2. Cellular Detection of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) Generation
2.3. Analysis of Gene Expression
2.4. Histopathological Assessments
2.5. Western Blot Analysis
2.6. Statistical Examination
3. Results
3.1. Modifications in Body Mass and Liver Index as a Result of Therapies
Effects of saroglitazar (SARO), resveratrol (RES), and the combination of RES and SARO on body weight (A); liver weight (B); and liver triglycerides (C) in rats after high-fat emulsion and drug administration; hematoxylin and eosin staining of liver tissue samples (D). The data values are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) (n = 8). Significant differences between HFD and NC (P < 0.05) are indicated by *, and significant differences between HFD and other groups are indicated by #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, and ###P < 0.001. NC, control group; HFD, high-fat diet; SARO, saroglitazar; RES, resveratrol.
3.2. Decrease in Liver Enzymes and Lipids by the RES and SARO Combination in the NASH Model
Serum levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) after high-fat emulsion and drug administration. Mean values between different groups were analyzed using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the Tukey-Kramer post-hoc test. Data values are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Significant differences between HFD and NC (P < 0.05) are indicated by *, and significant differences between HFD and other groups are indicated by #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001, and ####P < 0.0001. NC, control group; HFD, high-fat diet; SARO, saroglitazar; RES, resveratrol; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
3.3. Regulation of Lipid-Related Gene Expression by the RES and SARO Combination
Expression of SREBP-1c, FAS, ACC, PPARγ, PPARα, and CPT-1α in liver tissue after high-fat emulsion and drug administration. Relative gene expression at mRNA levels was evaluated by real-time PCR, and results were normalized to the GAPDH signal. The 2-ΔΔCT formula was used to determine fold change in each group (mean ± standard deviation [SD]). Significant differences between HFD and NC (P < 0.05) are indicated by *, and significant differences between HFD and other groups are indicated by #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001, and ####P < 0.0001. NC, control group; HFD, high-fat diet; SARO, saroglitazar; RES, resveratrol.
3.4. Modulation of Pro-inflammatory mRNA Expression by the RES and SARO Combination
Expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-β1) in liver tissue following high-fat emulsion and drug administration. Relative gene expression at mRNA levels was evaluated by real-time PCR, and results were normalized to the GAPDH signal. The 2-ΔΔCT formula was used to determine fold change in each group (mean ± standard deviation [SD]). Significant differences between HFD and NC (P < 0.05) are indicated by *, and significant differences between HFD and other groups are indicated by #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001, and ####P < 0.0001. NC, control group; HFD, high-fat diet; SARO, saroglitazar; RES, resveratrol; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-alpha; TGF-β1, transforming growth factor-beta 1; IL-1β, interleukin 1beta; IL-6, interleukin 6.
3.5. Decrease in Oxidative Stress and Related Gene Expression due to the Combination of RES and SARO
Gene expression levels of related genes and detection of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the combination group (saroglitazar [SARO] + resveratrol [RES]) treatment. Hepatic mRNA levels were evaluated using quantitative real-time PCR and normalized to GAPDH mRNA expression. Values are presented as the mean ± standard deviation of fold changes compared to the NC. Analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by the Tukey-Kramer multiple comparisons test, was used to examine between-group differences. Significant differences between HFD and NC (P < 0.05) are indicated by *, and significant differences between HFD and other groups are indicated by #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001, and ####P < 0.0001. NC, control group; HFD, high-fat diet; SARO, saroglitazar; RES, resveratrol; ROS, reactive oxygen species; NOX1, 2, 4 (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase)
3.6. Inhibition of Expression of TGF-β1 and p-Smad3 Proteins by the RES and SARO Combination
Protein expression levels of transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-β) and P-Smad3. Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as the loading control. Protein levels of p-Smad3 in control and treated cells were quantified using ImageJ software (v1.52) and normalized to GAPDH band intensity. Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Significant differences between HFD and NC (P < 0.05) are indicated by *, and significant differences between HFD and other groups are indicated by #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001, and ####P < 0.0001. NC, control group; HFD, high-fat diet; SARO, saroglitazar; RES, resveratrol; TGF-β1, transforming growth factor-beta 1; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase.


![Expression of SREBP-1c, FAS, ACC, PPARγ, PPARα, and CPT-1α in liver tissue after high-fat emulsion and drug administration. Relative gene expression at mRNA levels was evaluated by real-time PCR, and results were normalized to the GAPDH signal. The 2<sup>-ΔΔCT</sup> formula was used to determine fold change in each group (mean ± standard deviation [SD]). Significant differences between HFD and NC (P < 0.05) are indicated by *, and significant differences between HFD and other groups are indicated by #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001, and ####P < 0.0001. NC, control group; HFD, high-fat diet; SARO, saroglitazar; RES, resveratrol. Expression of SREBP-1c, FAS, ACC, PPARγ, PPARα, and CPT-1α in liver tissue after high-fat emulsion and drug administration. Relative gene expression at mRNA levels was evaluated by real-time PCR, and results were normalized to the GAPDH signal. The 2<sup>-ΔΔCT</sup> formula was used to determine fold change in each group (mean ± standard deviation [SD]). Significant differences between HFD and NC (P < 0.05) are indicated by *, and significant differences between HFD and other groups are indicated by #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001, and ####P < 0.0001. NC, control group; HFD, high-fat diet; SARO, saroglitazar; RES, resveratrol.](https://brieflands.com/journals/hepatmon/articles/138237/figures/hepatmon-138237-i003-F3-preview.webp)
![Expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-β1) in liver tissue following high-fat emulsion and drug administration. Relative gene expression at mRNA levels was evaluated by real-time PCR, and results were normalized to the GAPDH signal. The 2<sup>-ΔΔCT</sup> formula was used to determine fold change in each group (mean ± standard deviation [SD]). Significant differences between HFD and NC (P < 0.05) are indicated by *, and significant differences between HFD and other groups are indicated by #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001, and ####P < 0.0001. NC, control group; HFD, high-fat diet; SARO, saroglitazar; RES, resveratrol; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-alpha; TGF-β1, transforming growth factor-beta 1; IL-1β, interleukin 1beta; IL-6, interleukin 6. Expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-β1) in liver tissue following high-fat emulsion and drug administration. Relative gene expression at mRNA levels was evaluated by real-time PCR, and results were normalized to the GAPDH signal. The 2<sup>-ΔΔCT</sup> formula was used to determine fold change in each group (mean ± standard deviation [SD]). Significant differences between HFD and NC (P < 0.05) are indicated by *, and significant differences between HFD and other groups are indicated by #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001, and ####P < 0.0001. NC, control group; HFD, high-fat diet; SARO, saroglitazar; RES, resveratrol; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-alpha; TGF-β1, transforming growth factor-beta 1; IL-1β, interleukin 1beta; IL-6, interleukin 6.](https://brieflands.com/journals/hepatmon/articles/138237/figures/hepatmon-138237-i004-F4-preview.webp)
![Gene expression levels of related genes and detection of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the combination group (saroglitazar [SARO] + resveratrol [RES]) treatment. Hepatic mRNA levels were evaluated using quantitative real-time PCR and normalized to GAPDH mRNA expression. Values are presented as the mean ± standard deviation of fold changes compared to the NC. Analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by the Tukey-Kramer multiple comparisons test, was used to examine between-group differences. Significant differences between HFD and NC (P < 0.05) are indicated by *, and significant differences between HFD and other groups are indicated by #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001, and ####P < 0.0001. NC, control group; HFD, high-fat diet; SARO, saroglitazar; RES, resveratrol; ROS, reactive oxygen species; NOX1, 2, 4 (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase) Gene expression levels of related genes and detection of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the combination group (saroglitazar [SARO] + resveratrol [RES]) treatment. Hepatic mRNA levels were evaluated using quantitative real-time PCR and normalized to GAPDH mRNA expression. Values are presented as the mean ± standard deviation of fold changes compared to the NC. Analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by the Tukey-Kramer multiple comparisons test, was used to examine between-group differences. Significant differences between HFD and NC (P < 0.05) are indicated by *, and significant differences between HFD and other groups are indicated by #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001, and ####P < 0.0001. NC, control group; HFD, high-fat diet; SARO, saroglitazar; RES, resveratrol; ROS, reactive oxygen species; NOX1, 2, 4 (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase)](https://brieflands.com/journals/hepatmon/articles/138237/figures/hepatmon-138237-i005-F5-preview.webp)
