1. Background
Hepatitis B is one of the most common and dangerous infections worldwide. It is more common in developing countries, such as Iran, and other Middle Eastern countries than in developed countries. Its prevalence is associated with the socio-cultural and economic climate. Among Asian countries, the endemicity of hepatitis B is highest in China. In the Middle East, the endemicity is low in Iran, Bahrain, and Kuwait but high in Egypt, Jordan, Oman, Palestine, Yemen, and Saudi Arabia (1).
Preventive vaccination of newborns, increased knowledge of the risk factors for hepatitis B, and vaccination of high-risk groups have led to a marked decrease in hepatitis B virus (HBV) endemicity in recent years in Iran, although it remains high. According to various studies, the prevalence of the hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) varies, but a prevalence of 1.2% - 5% was reported in Iranian provinces (2-4). The prevalence of hepatitis B infection is greater in some eastern provinces, such as Sistan, Baluchestan, and Khorasan, due to their closer ties to Afghanistan, where the prevalence of the disease is higher (5, 6).
The evaluation of risk factors for HBV infection is important for designing strategies to control the disease (7). Depending on the region, many risk factors for hepatitis B infections have been proposed. Changes in the transmission pattern of new cases of hepatitis B in Iran have been reported recently. There have been no comprehensive seroepidemiological studies of the prevalence of hepatitis B in Birjand, the capital of South Khorasan province.
2. Objectives
The present study evaluated the risk factors for hepatitis and the prevalence of the disease in a large group of patients in South Khorasan, Iran.
3. Methods
A cross-sectional study was conducted in Birjand, the capital of the South Khorasan province of Iran, in 2013 - 2014. Birjand is located in northeastern Iran where the weather is warm and dry. The estimated population of Birjand is about 178,000. The city does not have many industries and is surrounded by deserts. The south Khorasan province borders Afghanistan. The study consisted of 5235 individuals aged 15 - 70 years. The sample size was estimated according to the following formula, in which the overall national prevalence of hepatitis B was considered equal to 3% (Equation 1):
Equation 1.
Where Z2 is constant, p is the prevalence, q = (1 - p), and d is the estimated error risk. A multistage sampling method (randomized clusters) was used. According to the city’s postal areas, 250 clusters were identified. In each cluster, 20 subjects (equal gender distribution ratio) were selected. Equal numbers of males and females were selected from a range of age groups (15 - 24, 25 - 34, 35 - 44, 45 - 54, 54 - 70, and older than 70 years).
After explaining the research project and the importance of hepatitis B, the participants were invited to take part in the study and undergo hepatitis B testing at no cost. The inclusion criteria were aged 15 - 100 years, consented to take part in the study, possessed national identification documents, and had the ability to respond to the interviewer. The exclusion criteria included non-Iranian nationality. After explaining the nature of the research project, each participant completed an informed consent form. The checklist of risk factors and epidemiological characteristics were based on a review of the literature.
Experienced technicians performed the blood sampling, data gathering, and questionnaire administration. Venous blood (8 mL) was collected from each subject. The specimens were placed in sterile-covered storage tubes and stored at -30°C until collection of all the samples. The results were relayed to the subjects.
3.1. Assays
The detection of the hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) (bioELISA anti HBc, Biokit, Barcelona, Spain) in the serum samples was done using a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (bioELISA anti HBc, Biokit, Barcelona, Spain). Seropositive specimens were tested for HBsAg (Enzygenost® HBS Ag 5.0, Dade Behring Inc., Newark, U.S.). AST and ALT were analyzed by enzymatic photometry. All measuring laboratory equipment was calibrated. All the subjects underwent a clinical and physical examination by a medical doctor. One individual collected all the data.
3.2. Statistical Analysis
This project was approved by the ethics and scientific committee of Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Iran (approval code: bums.1394.11). The quantitative and qualitative data were analyzed using SPSS, ver. 21 (Chicago, IL, U.S.). For qualitative data, the normal distribution was assessed using the K-S test. For data with a normal distribution, the means ± standard deviation (SD) were computed, and independent T-tests and the Mann-Whitney test were performed. P values were used to evaluate the null hypothesis. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to determine the association between one group and another. Qualitative data were described and analyzed using frequencies and prevalence, in addition to the chi-squared test. A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
4. Results
The mean age was 39.07 ± 14.04 y, and 2732 (52.2%) participants were females. Most of the subjects were married (n = 4248, 81.1%), and 1567 (29.9%) had a college education. Detailed demographic features are shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Demographic Characteristics of the Participants
| Item/Status | No. (%) |
|---|---|
| Gender | |
| Male | 2503 (47.8) |
| Female | 2732 (52.2) |
| Marital status | |
| Single | 873 (16.7) |
| Married | 4248 (81.1) |
| Divorced | 20 (0.4) |
| Widow | 94 (1.8) |
| Educational status | |
| Illiterate | 575 (11) |
| Primary | 960 (18.3) |
| Pre-high school | 584 (11.2) |
| High school | 1549 (29.6) |
| College | 1567 (29.9) |
| Age group, y | |
| 15 - 24 | 942 (18) |
| 25 - 34 | 1253 (23.9) |
| 35 - 44 | 1051 (20.1) |
| 45 - 54 | 1007 (19.2) |
| 55 - 64 | 714 (13.6) |
| 65 and older | 268 (5.1) |
The HBc-positive antibody was detected in 786 subjects, giving an overall prevalence of 15%. The prevalence of HBc seropositivity was significantly higher in males (16.9% in males vs. 13.3% in females; P < 0.001, OR = 1.33, CI = 1.15 - 1.6), those with a lower level of education (26.6% in the illiterate group vs. 8.9% in the college group, P < 0.001), and older subjects (32.1% in those aged 65 - 70 years [oldest group] vs. 3.9% in those aged 15 - 24 years [youngest group]; P = 0.001). Among the known risk factors that were assessed, the prevalence of HBc seropositivity was significantly higher in subjects with a history of blood transfusions vs. those with no history (23.5% vs. 14.7%; P = 0.001, OR = 1.8, CI = 1.3 - 2.5), a history of cupping vs. no history (18.3% vs. 14.4% ; P = 0.004, OR = 1.3 , CI = 1.1 - 1.6), a history of hospitalization vs. no history (16.2% vs. 14.1%; P = 0.03, OR = 1.2 , CI = 1.01 - 1.4), a history of endoscopy vs. no history (19.7% vs. 14.5%, P = 0.002, OR = 1.5 , CI = 1.14 - 1.9), a history of oral drug addiction vs. no history (26.6% vs. 14.7%, P < 0.001, OR = 2.1, CI = 1.4 - 3.1), and a history of intravenous (IV) drug abuse vs. no history (44.4% vs. 15%, P = 0.03, OR = 4.5, CI = 1.2 - 16.9). In addition, the prevalence of HBc-seropositivity was significantly higher in subjects who had at least one positive case of hepatitis B in the family (37.3% vs. 14.5%, P < 0.001, OR = 3.5, CI = 2.4 - 5.1) or at least one positive case of hepatitis C in the family (39.1% vs. 14.9%, P < 0.001, OR = 3.7, CI = 1.6 - 8.5).
In contrast, the numbers of HBc-seropositive cases were lower in those with a history of piercing compared to those with no such history (12.2% vs. 16.4%; P < 0.001, OR = 0.71, CI = 0.84 - 0.59). A history of hepatitis B vaccination (13.1% vs. 15.7%, P = 0.03, OR = 1.23, CI = 1.03 - 1.5) and use of dental services (13.5% vs. 15.7%, P = 0.03, OR = 0.84, CI = 0.99 - 2.43) were also less common among HBc-positive antibody cases in comparison with HBc-negative antibody cases (Table 2).
Table 2. Demographic Characteristics of the Participants and Their Test Results
| Item/Status | HBc Antibody Positive | P Value (OR and CI) | HBsAg Positive | P Value (OR and CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | < 0.001 (1.33 and 1.15 - 1.6) | 0.01 (1.74 and 1.12 - 2.7) | ||
| Male | 424 (16.9) | 52 (2.1) | ||
| Female | 362 (13.3) | 33 (1.2) | ||
| Education | < 0.001 | 0.09 | ||
| Illiterate | 153 (26.6) | 12 (2.1) | ||
| Primary | 206 (21.5) | 17 (1.8) | ||
| Pre-high school | 97 (16.6) | 10 (1.7) | ||
| High school | 190 (12.3) | 32 (2.1) | ||
| College | 140 (8.9) | 14 (0.9) | ||
| Age group | ||||
| 15 - 24 | 37 (3.9) | < 0.001 | 5 (0.5) | 0.015 |
| 25 - 34 | 99 (7.9) | 15 (1.2) | ||
| 35 - 44 | 158 (15) | 21 (2) | ||
| 45 - 54 | 218 (21.6) | 24 (2.4) | ||
| 55 - 64 | 188 (26.3) | 14 (2) | ||
| 65 - 70 | 86 (32.1) | 6 (2.2) | ||
| Alcohol drinking | 0.09 | - | ||
| Yes (38) | 2 (5.3) | 0 | ||
| No (51970) | 784 (15.1) | 85 (1.6) | ||
| Smoker | 0.09 | 0.66 | ||
| Yes (367) | 66 (18) | 7 (1.9) | ||
| No (4868) | 720 (14.8) | 78 (1.6) | ||
| Blood transfusion | 0.001 (1.8 and 1.3 - 2.5) | 0.34 | ||
| Yes (196) | 46 (23.5) | 1 (0.5) | ||
| No (5039) | 740 (14.7) | 84 (1.7) | ||
| Cupping | 0.004 (1.3 and 1.1 - 1.6) | 0.03 (1.7 and 1.04 - 2.9) | ||
| Yes (802) | 147 (18.3) | 20 (2.5) | ||
| No (4433) | 639 (14.4) | 65 (1.5) | ||
| Major surgery | 0.98 | 0.6 | ||
| Yes (1235) | 217 (17.6) | 18 (1.5) | ||
| No (4000) | 569 (14.2) | 67 (1.7) | ||
| Minor surgery | 0.03 | 0.24 | ||
| Yes (1470) | 221 (15) | 19 (1.3) | ||
| No (3765) | 565 (15) | 66 (1.8) | ||
| Hospitalization | 0.03 (1.2 and 1.01 - 1.4) | 0.93 | ||
| Yes (2304) | 374 (16.2) | 37 (1.6) | ||
| No (2931) | 412 (14.1) | 48 (1.6) | ||
| Dental service | 0.035 (0.48 and 0.99 - 2.43) | 0.68 | ||
| Yes (1709) | 231 (13.5) | 26 (1.5) | ||
| No (3526) | 555 (15.7) | 59 (1.7) | ||
| Endoscopy | 0.002 (1.5 and 1.14 - 1.9) | 0.08 | ||
| Yes (507) | 100 (19.7) | 13 (2.6) | ||
| No (4728) | 686 (14.5) | 72 (1.5) | ||
| Non-IV drug abuse | ≥ 0.001 (2.1 and 1.4 - 3.1) | 0.07 | ||
| Yes (139) | 37 (26.6) | 5 (3.6) | ||
| No (5069) | 749 (14.7) | 80 (1.6) | ||
| IV drug abuse | 0.03 (4.5 and 1.2 - 16.9) | 0.7 | ||
| Yes (9) | 4 (44.4) | 0 | ||
| No (5226) | 782 (15) | 85 (1.6) | ||
| Tattoo | 0.72 | 1 | ||
| Yes (81) | 11 (13.6) | 1 (1.2) | ||
| No (5154) | 775 (15) | 84 (1.6) | ||
| Illegal sexual contact | 0.5 | 0.52 | ||
| Yes (44) | 5 (11.4) | 1 (2.3) | ||
| No (5191) | 781 (15) | 84 (1.6) | ||
| Needle stick | 0.85 | 1 | ||
| Yes (36) | 5 (13.9) | 0 | ||
| No (5199) | 781 (15) | 85 (1.6) | ||
| Hepatitis B vaccination | 0.03 (1.23 and 1.3 - 1.5) | 0.76 | ||
| Yes (1340) | 176 (13.1) | 23 (1.7) | ||
| No (3895) | 610 (15.7) | 62 (1.6) | ||
| Family member with hepatitis B | ≥ 0.001 (3.5 and 2.4 - 5.1) | ≥ 0.001 (14.7 and 8.5 - 25.6) | ||
| Yes (118) | 44 (37.3) | 19 (16.1) | ||
| No (5117) | 742 (14.5) | 66 (1.3) | ||
| Family member with hepatitis C | 0.004 (3.7 and 1.6 - 8.5) | ≥ 0.001 (13.3 and 4.4 - 40) | ||
| Yes (23) | 9 (39.1) | 4 (17.4) | ||
| No (5212) | 777 (14.9) | 81 (1.6) | ||
| Piercings | ≥ 0.001 (0.71 and 0.84 - 0.59 | 0.08 | ||
| Yes (1686) | 205 (12.2) | 20 (1.2) | ||
| No (3549) | 581 (16.4) | 65 (1.8) |
In the study, 85 (1.6%) of the subjects were HBsAg positive, 2.1% of whom were males and 1.2% of whom were females. (P = 0.01, OR = 1.74, CI = 1.12 - 2.7). HBsAg seropositivity was detected in 0.5% of subjects in the youngest age group and 2.2% of subjects in the oldest age group (P = 0.015). HBsAg seropositivity was present in 2.5% of cases with a history of cupping vs. 1.5% in those with no history (P = 0.03, OR = 1.7, CI = 1.04 - 2.9), 16.1% of cases with at least one positive case of hepatitis B in their family vs. 1.3% in those with no history (P < 0.001, OR = 14.7, CI = 8.5 - 25.6 ), and 17.4% of subjects with at least one positive case of hepatitis C in their family vs. 1.6% in those with no history (P < 0.001, OR = 13.3, CI = 4.4 - 40 ) (Table 2).
The mean ± SD of ALT among the anti-HBc-positive cases was 23.9 ± 16.1 mg/dL compared to 23.6 ± 16.3 mg/dl in the negative cases (P = 0.004), whereas the AST was not significantly different between these two groups (P = 0.07). The mean ± SD of ALT and AST in those with a positive HBsAg test was 29.8 ± 31.3 and 25.2 ± 16.3 mg/dL, respectively, compared to 32.5 ± 15.9 and 21.02 ± 11.6 mg/dL, respectively, in those with no positive test (P = 0.022 and P = 0.002, respectively, Table 3).
Table 3. Liver Function Test Results and Viral Test Findingsa
| Item | HBc Antibody Positive | HBc Antibody Negative | P Value | HBsAg Positive | HBsAg Negative | P Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALT | 23.9 ± 16.1 | 23.6 ± 16.3 | 0.004 | 29.8 ± 31.3 | 23.5 ± 15.9 | 0.022 |
| AST | 21.4 ± 9.6 | 21.04 ± 12.1 | 0.07 | 25.2 ± 16.3 | 21.02 ± 11.6 | 0.002 |
aBased on the Mann-Whitney test.
5. Discussion
The prevalence of HBc antibody and HBsAg seropositivity in the present study was 15% and 1.6%, respectively. These values are similar to those reported in other regional and national research. The prevalence of the HBc antibody was significantly higher in men, older subjects, and those with a low level of education.
In the next the two decades, the prevalence of HBsAg and HBc antibodies in Iran will decrease due to a national hepatitis B vaccination program in the neonatal and infancy periods. The higher incidence of HBV infection in the older groups in the present study was expected, as the possibility of contact with HBV increases with older age (7).
Apart from known conventional risk factors, such as IV drug abuse, sexual contacts, piercings, familial infections, and tattoos, we found that some local, traditional unsafe behaviors, including traditional cupping and oral drug abuse, appeared to be risk factors for positive HBc antibody and HBsAg tests. Traditional cupping (bloodletting) is often performed in nonstandard health care units, and the practice is not regulated by the government. The risk of transmission in exposed cases is increased (5). In a study in Mashhad in northeastern Iran, the nearest geographical and culturally similar city to Birjand, Fathimoghaddam et al. reported that traditional cupping, in addition to drug abuse, was the major risk factor for hepatitis B infections in their study population (5). Rafatpanah et al. demonstrated that HTLV-1 infection was higher in patients with a history of traditional cupping in Mashhad (8). To prevent infections transmitted via blood, governmental regulation of traditional cupping and piercing practices in our local area seems to be warranted.
In this study, the most important risk factor for hepatitis B infection was familial infections. For HBsAg, the risk of a positive test was 13 and 14 times greater in subjects with a family history of hepatitis B and C infections, respectively, vs. those with no such history, and while this ratio for the HBc antibody was estimated more than 3.5 times in these cases. This finding was previously confirmed in nucleotide studies (9). Thus, families should be informed about how viral hepatitis is transmitted.
The risk factors for hepatitis B can differ, depending on cultural, educational, socio-economic, and geographical variables. Population-based cross-sectional studies and seroepidemiological surveys can shed light on the status of hepatitis B in the target population (2, 10).
In Iran, many studies have tried to determine the prevalence of HBV infections and risk factors for the disease in different regions in the country. A brief review on some of these is provided in Table 4.
Table 4. A Review of the Literature on Previous Similar Studies in Iran
| Province or City | Author | Year | Sample Size | HBsAg Positive, % | HBc Antibody Positive, % | Main Risk Factors |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Birjand | Ziaee et al. (3) | 2015 | 5235 | 1.6 | 15 | Male, age, drug abuse, family history |
| Tehran | 4 studies (4, 11-13) | 2001 - 2007 | 7870 | 2.2 | N/A | Male |
| East Azerbaijan | 3 studies (4, 14, 15) | 2001 - 2005 | 5320 | 1.3 | N/A | Male |
| Golestan | 3 studies | 2003 - 2007 | 4931 | 6.3 | N/A | Male |
| Isfahan | Ataie | 2006 | 816 | 1.3 | N/A | |
| Hormozgan | Merat (3) | 2006 | 1988 | 2.4 | N/A | Male |
| Zahedan | Ansari-Moghaddam (6) | 2008 - 2009 | 2578 | 2.5 | N/A | Male, married, older age |
| Kermanshah | Kazerani | 1999 - 2003 | 6820 | 1.3% | N/A | N/A |
| Nahavand | Alizadeh et al. (16) | 2006 | 1824 | 2.3 | 7.8 | History of surgery or imprisonment |
| Kurdistan | Alavian et al. (17) | 2012 | 1613 | 0.8 | 5.02 | Older age, marriage, intrafamilial HBV transmission |
| Mashhad | Fathimoghaddam et al. (5) | 2011 | 1652 | 1.39 | N/A | Older age, married, Afghani, and traditional cupping |
| Amol | Keyvani et al. (18) | 2014 | 6146 | 0.9 | 10.5 | A history of hepatitis among first--degree family members, a history of tattooing, a history of previous hepatitis, male sex, and age |
| Kohgiloyeh and Boyerahmad | Khosravani et al. (19) | 2009 - 2010 | 2009 | 1.2 | N/A | Male, drug abuse, level of education, and place of residence |
| Kerman | Hayatbakhsh et al. (20) | 2011 - 2012 | 370 | 1.1 | 8.9 | Living status |
| Yazd | Javadzadeh Shahshahani et al. (21) | 2013 | 254760 | 0.25 | N/A | Recipient of allogenic whole blood donation |
| Mazandaran) | Mousavi et al. (22) | 2011 - 2013 | 2650 | 0.08 | N/A | N/A |
| Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari | Moezzi et al. (23) | 2012 - 2013 | 3000 | 1.3 | N/A | Male, aged over 55 y, farmer, and nonpublic occupation |
| Sistan Baluchestan | Salehi et al. (24) | 2012 | 3989 | 3.38 | 23.5 | Marital status and addiction |
Abbreviation: N/A, Not available
In the present study, it is worth nothing that the prevalence of HBc-positive and HBsAg-positive cases was higher in men. Thus, in Birjand, men seem to have more contact with the HBV. This may be due to occupational exposure or addiction behaviors.
The subjects with a positive HBc antibody test had a lower history of using dental services than those with a negative test. Thus, they may be less likely to take care of their health (25). A previous study demonstrated that public health was associated with the prevalence of hepatitis B infection in this geographical region (26).
Birjand is a city of high immigrant diversity (mostly Afghan). Previous studies reported that the prevalence of hepatitis B infections was higher among Afghan immigrants and that the higher rate of hepatitis B infections in eastern Iran could be associated with the number of Afghan immigrants (27, 28). Another study suggested that all immigrants, regardless of the time since they had left their home countries, should undergo screening for major transmissible infections (29). Moreover, Behzadi et al. recommended that HBV screening of immigrants should be take place at entrances to country borders (27). The same study strongly recommended free vaccination and treatment programs and improving the level of HBV knowledge among Afghan immigrants in Iran.
As shown in Table 4, the mean prevalence of HBsAg seropositivity in Iran was 0.8% - 2.5%, although a prevalence of 6.3% was reported in Golestan. The observed prevalence in the present study was in the middle of this range. The geographical pattern in the prevalence of HBsAg changed according to various risk factors in the area. More studies are needed to determine the role of different risk factors in the increased frequency in various cities, such as Zahedan, Tehran, and Golestan. The higher rate of drug abuse, increased use of risky interventions (e.g., cupping), and a lower level of knowledge about hepatitis may be keys to the different pattern of risk factors in Birjand compared to other cities and provinces.
Well-known risk factors for hepatitis B infection are a history of imprisonment, tattooing, illegal drug consumption, blood transfusions, and lower education levels. Living with family and friends or being lonely was reported to be risk factor for hepatitis B infections, although not all studies confirmed these findings.
In conclusion, the prevalence of HBsAg seropositivity seems to be lower in the central provinces of Iran than in the eastern and northern provinces. Patients with abnormal levels of ALT or AST and those exposed to the aforementioned risk factors should undergo hepatitis B screening. The prevalence of hepatitis B infection is decreasing in Iran and worldwide because of vaccination programs (30). However, information is needed on the characteristics of the spread of hepatitis B and associated risk factors in subprovinces to design a target plan to control hepatitis B-related mortality and morbidity in the elderly and prevent transmission in the at-risk younger population. A map of the spread of hepatitis B in different areas would help to anticipate risk factors for the disease.
