The QCT inhibited HOTAIR and GPC5 expression while upregulating miR-217 in a dose-dependent manner in both cell lines. Suppression was more pronounced in AGS than in MKN-45 cells, suggesting inherent differences in HOTAIR regulation — possibly due to baseline HOTAIR expression or molecular heterogeneity among GC subtypes (
17). The GPC5 protein reduction was also less substantial in MKN-45 cells, potentially reflecting lineage-specific reliance on glypican-mediated pathways (
18). These results align with evidence that GC cell lines possess unique molecular profiles affecting treatment responsiveness (
19).
The HOTAIR is recognized as a key contributor to GC carcinogenesis, promoting malignancy by modulating intracellular pathways and altering microRNA levels (
20,
21). The miR-217, sponged by HOTAIR, increases oncogene expression and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in GC cells. The antitumor role of miR-217 in gastrointestinal malignancies is largely mediated by inhibition of proliferation and invasion (
11,
22). The GPC5, a target of miR-217, is implicated in tumor progression. Thus, HOTAIR, miR-217, and GPC5 are promising therapeutic targets, and agents modulating this axis represent potential strategies for GC management.
While this study elucidates the mechanistic action of QCT on the HOTAIR/miR-217/GPC5 axis, its potential interactions with other critical GC signaling networks, such as the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) pathway, warrant further exploration (
23). For example, QCT-mediated HOTAIR suppression may influence TGF-β effectors like SMAD proteins, as lncRNAs often serve as scaffolds for chromatin-modifying complexes. Additionally, the reduction in GPC5 may impact growth factor pathways such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling (
24), potentially contributing to QCT’s anti-angiogenic and anti-invasive effects. Thus, QCT’s antitumoral actions likely involve both direct suppression of the HOTAIR/miR-217/GPC5 axis and indirect modulation of broader oncogenic networks.
The QCT-induced apoptosis and cell cycle arrest were dose-dependent in both cell lines, though MKN-45 displayed greater resistance. This may be due to differential expression of anti-apoptotic regulators or epigenetic modifications, as seen in chemoresistant GC models (
22). Malignant cells evade apoptosis and proliferate excessively (
25). Here, QCT at high doses significantly reduced cyclin A2 and D1 levels. Cell cycle modulation was more robust in AGS cells; MKN-45 cells required higher QCT concentrations for similar effects, possibly due to aberrant cyclin-dependent kinase activity in metastatic GC subtypes (
26). Cyclin A2 upregulation drives proliferation, while its targeting induces arrest and apoptosis. Cyclin D1 is a GC progression marker, and its downregulation is therapeutically valuable (
26).
Mutations in TP53 and loss of PTEN function are frequent in advanced GC (
27,
28). In this study, QCT upregulated TP53 and PTEN, suppressing invasion in both cell lines, though MKN-45 exhibited greater PTEN protein variability at 100 μM. This reflects clinical observations of intra-tumor plasticity and compensatory signaling in GC (
27). Excess reactive oxygen species and oxidative stress damage DNA and lipids, promoting angiogenesis and invasion (
29). The QCT increased SOD and catalase activity, enzymes that convert reactive oxygen species into less reactive molecules. While both cell lines showed increased antioxidant enzyme activity, only MKN-45 exhibited significant MDA reduction, underscoring lineage-specific differences in lipid peroxidation dynamics and the need for diverse models when evaluating phytochemicals (
22).
Despite compelling in vitro data, QCT’s clinical translation is challenged by poor bioavailability due to extensive first-pass metabolism and low water solubility (
30,
31). Innovative delivery systems, such as nanoparticles and liposomes, are being developed to improve QCT’s bioavailability and targeted delivery. The mechanistic insights provided here support the rationale for future in vivo studies employing such strategies to assess QCT’s therapeutic efficacy.
Limitations include the exclusive use of in vitro models, which cannot fully capture the complexity of the tumor microenvironment or systemic pharmacology. The study focused narrowly on the HOTAIR/miR-217/GPC5 axis, not excluding other contributing pathways. Furthermore, the connection between TP53/PTEN upregulation and reduced invasion was correlative; genetic knockdown studies are needed for definitive causal inference. Future research should employ in vivo models and broader pathway analysis to facilitate translation of these promising results.
5.1. Conclusions
This study demonstrates that QCT exerts significant antitumor effects in GC by targeting the HOTAIR/miR-217/GPC5 pathway. AGS cells were more sensitive to QCT, with marked cyclin downregulation and strong apoptotic activation, while MKN-45 cells displayed diminished responses, highlighting the impact of molecular heterogeneity on therapeutic efficacy. The QCT further inhibited invasion via TP53/PTEN upregulation and modulated oxidative stress by enhancing antioxidant enzyme activity and reducing lipid peroxidation in MKN-45 cells. These preclinical in vitro findings reveal the diverse mechanisms through which QCT suppresses GC cell proliferation and survival, suggesting its potential for further development as an adjunctive therapy. However, these findings are preliminary and require validation in complex in vivo models. Variations in lineage-specific efficacy emphasize the need for rigorous preclinical studies in animal models before clinical trial consideration. Future research should refine dosing strategies and explore combination therapies to address resistance mechanisms.