Preeclampsia, as one of the most common and important hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, is a major health problem worldwide and a threat to mothers and infants’ well-being (
2). Based on geographic regions of the world, prevalence of hypertension-complicated pregnancies are different (
1) and range from 1.5% in Sweden, 2.6% in southwest Saudi Arabia and 3% in northwest Saudi Arabia to 7.5% in Brazil (
2). In the present study the prevalence of preeclampsia in the two hospitals of Kashan University of Medical Sciences was 5%. The exact incidence of preeclampsia in unknown but Infants born to mothers with pregnancy-induced hypertension are susceptible to morbidity and mortality and have higher NICU admission rates than neonate born to healthy women. These babies may have a spectrum of laboratory disorders. In our study, hematologic abnormalities were the most common disorders among these infants.
A common and well-defined effect of preeclampsia on neutrophils of neonates is neutropenia with an incidence of 50% (
7,
8). It is a transient hematologic alteration, lasting days to weeks, related to the severity of pregnancy-induced hypertension. Neutropenia mainly affects the smaller and younger neonates and may be associated with an increased risk of nosocomial infection. In our study prevalence of neutropenia was 38%, compatible with 33% neutropenia in Harms et al. study (
9) and primarily among preterm and low-birth-weight infants. Neutropenia in preterm and low-birth-weight infants is supported by other studies (
10).
The reason behind neutropenia is unknown, but it is claimed that the uteroplacental insufficiency inhibits the production of myeloid lineage by bone marrow. Reduced numbers of circulating colony forming unit granulocyte macrophage (CFU-GM) and decreased neutrophil storage pool is associated with neutropenia (
4). In severe cases the use of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (GCSF) can improve the absolute neutrophil count (
11). There are some reports of an increased risk of neonatal infection, but other studies did not support these findings (
12,
13).
Thrombocytopenia was present in 27.3% of our cases compared with the findings of Sivakumar et al. who have noted thrombocytopenia in 22% of infants born to preeclamptic mothers (
12). Other studies showed variable incidences of thrombocytopenia as 33% by Harm et al. (
9), 34% by Eltink et al. (
14) and 36% by Bhat et al. (
15). Occurrence of thrombocytopenia was found to be associated with decreased birth weight and gestational age. Raizada et al. showed that preterm infants born to preeclamptic mothers are at great risk of thrombocytopenia development (
16). Patricia et al. demonstrated that infants with < 1200 g birth weight as well as < 32 week of gestational age born to mothers with gestational hypertension, preeclampsia or eclampsia syndrome, had leukopenia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia (
17).
It has previously been postulated that thrombocytopenia is the result of placental insufficiency and decreased production (
8); however Samuels et al. have demonstrated abnormal platelet antibodies in the infants of preeclamptic mothers and considered an immune theory. There are studies that support the role of mediators in developing thrombocytopenia. Normally, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and placental growth factor (PIGF) are responsible for maturation of megakaryocyte and participate in the regulation of megakaryocyte development. Low levels of PIGF and VEGF are shown in the cord blood of preeclamptic mothers’ babies (
18). Thrombocytopenia is a transitory alteration, more commonly found in the first 72 hours after birth, with resolution within 10 days and is not severe in most cases.
Leukopenia was seen in 28.5% of the patients of this study, more common in babies with gestational age of 32 - 37 weeks. Harms et al. demonstrated leukopenia in 21% of the affected infants (
9). Hyperbilirubinemia was the most common metabolic disorder with an incidence of 39.2% in the current study, comparable to the one by Eiltink et al. (
14) in which 44.7% of cases had jaundice. Hypertensive disorder is a maternal risk factor for development of hypoglycemia in infants. In addition, vulnerability of premature and low–birth-weight infants to hypoglycemia is a well-recognized problem in neonatal medicine. The present study revealed hypoglycemia in 33.3% of patients, similar to Dhananjaya et al. study with a 40% incidence of hypoglycemia in preeclampsia/eclampsia (
19) and comparable with Eiltink et al. study (
14).
Another metabolic derangement was hypocalcemia. Preeclampsia, prematurity, perinatal stress/asphyxia, intrauterine growth restriction, infant of diabetic mother, maternal hyperparathyroidism, iatrogenic (alkalosis and use of blood products, diuretic, phototherapy, lipid infusion), maternal intake of anticonvulsants (Phenobarbital ,Phenytoin sodium) are all risk factors for hypocalcemia especially for the early-onset type which presents within 2 - 3 days of life (
20).
Positive cultures including blood, urine and CSF were observed in 16.6%, 11.9% and 7.1% of infants respectively. They were almost all preterm neonates and had no evidence of neutropenia. There is concern about the possible relationship between preeclampsia and sepsis. Procianoy et al. found early and late onset sepsis in 4.3% and 22.7% of study populations, respectively. They claimed of vaginal delivery and neutropenia as significant variables for early-onset sepsis as well as total parenteral nutrition, central catheters and mechanical ventilation for late-onset sepsis, regardless of the presence of neutropenia (
21). Probably prematurity was the causative factor of infection in our cases. The risk of sepsis in infants born to preeclamptic mothers is still controversial, but those with prolonged neutropenia could be at a higher risk of infection because of impaired host immunity after birth.
In our study a variety of coagulation alterations was seen as prolonged PT and PTT in 7.1% and 27.3% of patients respectively. Severe hypertension may result in a marked imbalance in the hemostatic system both in the mother and infant. Prolongation of PT, PTT and TT was demonstrated by Lox et al. and by Narayan et al. (
21,
22). One reason for this derangement may be the lack of balance between coagulation and fibrinolysis in localized area of vascular compartment especially uteroplacental circulation (
21). Neonates of preeclamptic mothers, who are at great risk for coagulation disorders and bleeding, require close follow up. In our patients, the acid base imbalance and hypoxia were mainly due to perinatal birth asphyxia and respiratory distress syndrome. Perinatal asphyxia experienced by these infants could be explained by the uteroplacental insufficiency and compromise of blood flow to the fetus which occurs in these pregnancies. Birth asphyxia and low APGAR score have been reported in many studies (
1-
3,
9).
There are conflicting results on the protective effects of hypertensive disorders for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Chang et al. claimed an increase in the incidence of hyaline membrane disease in the preeclamptic group especially in neonates with gestational age of < 32 weeks compared with non-preeclamptic control group (
23). Also a study from Tunis showed the increased risk of hyaline membrane disease in premature infants of preeclamptic mothers weighing less than 2000 g (
24). The confounding factors were controlled by these studies. Therefore, these findings support that fetal lung maturity is not accelerated in preeclampsia but in contrary it is delayed. Friedman et al. found no differences in the incidence of respiratory distress syndrome (
25).
However, there are studies which have reported the protective effects of hypertensive disorders on neonatal respiratory morbidities including respiratory distress syndrome (
26). Conditions that cause chronic stress may be associated with accelerated fetal pulmonary maturation due to increased cortisol production by the fetus. Neonatal morbidity in newborns of preeclamptic mothers is considerable and the need for medical intervention should be evaluated. Our findings showed that at least 50% of babies need some therapeutic measures.
Our study had some limitations. It had a retrospective design so it could not record all the variables completely. The small sample sizes besides the lack of a control group were other limitations of this study. Furthermore, we reported laboratory disorders in the babies born to preeclamptic mothers regardless of the severity of preeclampsia.
Despite all the obstetric attempts made to improve assessment and surveillance of women who have had hypertension in pregnancy, preeclampsia continues to be a common and serious complication of pregnancy and a cause of great concern because of the high rates of adverse maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes. The present study demonstrates a spectrum of laboratory abnormalities especially hematological ones in babies born to preeclamptic mothers. These abnormalities need early detection, timely referral to tertiary medical centers and prompt management in order to improve perinatal and neonatal conditions in these critical groups of patients.