1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
| Factors | Number of Diarrheic Subjects | Number (%) of ETEC-Positive Patients | P-Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, months | 0.03 | ||
| 0 - 5 | 49 | 1 (2.0) | |
| 6 - 12 | 165 | 8 (4.8) | |
| 13 - 24 | 116 | 1 (0.9) | |
| 25 - 36 | 29 | 3 (10.3) | |
| 37 - 48 | 17 | 0 (0.0) | |
| 49 - 60 | 24 | 3 (12.5) | |
| Sex | 0.03 | ||
| Male | 180 | 10 (5.6) | |
| Female | 220 | 6 (2.7) |
aOnly 1 out of 49 subjects, aged 0 - 5 months, had ETEC infection. ETEC infection in males was significantly higher than females (P < 0.05)
3.1. DNA Extraction
3.2. PCR Analysis
| Gene | Primer | Oligonucleotide Sequence (5’-3’) | PCR product, bpa | PCR Condition | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elt | 708 | 94°C, 1 min; 56°C, 2 min; 72°C, 1 min | (19) | ||
| ET-LT1 | GCGACAAATTATACCGTGCT | ||||
| ET-LT2 | CCGAATTCTGTTATATATGT | ||||
| Sta | 180 | 94°C, 30 sec; 55°C, 90 sec; 72°C, 90 sec | (20) | ||
| ST5’ | ATTTTTCTTTCTGTATTGTCTT | ||||
| ST3’ | CACCCGGTACAAGCAGGATT | ||||
| Eae | 790 | 94°C, 1 min; 55°C, 1 min; 72°C, 1 min | (21) | ||
| fM1 | CATTATGGAACGGCAGAGGT | ||||
| rYu4 | ATCTTCTGCGTACTGCGTTCA | ||||
| bfpA | 324 | 94°C, 30 sec; 43°C, 30 sec; 72°C, 1 min | (19) | ||
| EP1 | CAATGGTGCTTGCGCTTGCT | ||||
| EP2 | GCCGCTTTATCCAACCTGGT | ||||
| Stx | 900 | 94°C, 1 min; 43°C, 90 sec; 72°C, 90 sec | (22) | ||
| LIN5’ | GAACGAAATAATTTATATGT | ||||
| LIN3’ | TTTGATTGTTACAGTCAT | ||||
| ehxA | 321 | 94°C, 90 sec; 55°C, 90 sec; 72°C, 2 min | (20) | ||
| RH35 | CACACGGAGCTTATAATATTCTGTCA | ||||
| RH37 | AATGTTATCCCATTGACATCATTTGACT | ||||
| IpaH | 424 | 94°C, 1 min; 56°C, 2 min; 72°C 1 min | (19) | ||
| EI-1 | GCTGGAAAAACTCAGTGCCT | ||||
| EI-2 | CAGTCCGTAAATTCATTCT | ||||
| astA | 111 | 95°C, 30 sec; 55°C, 30 sec; 72°C, 30 sec | (23) | ||
| Eg1 | CCATCAACACAGTATATCCGA | ||||
| Eg2 | GGTCGCGAGTGACGGCTTTGT | ||||
| aaf/I | 432 | 95°C, 30 sec; 55°C, 30 sec; 72°C, 30 sec | (23) | ||
| AAF/I-1 | GCGTTAGAAAGACCTCCAATA | ||||
| AAF/I-2 | GCCGGATCCTTAAAAATTAATTCCGGC |
aThe PCR cycles consisted of denaturation, annealing, and extension
3.3. GM1 ELISA and CF Immunodot Blot Assay
3.4. Determination of Hemagglutination (HA) Activity
3.5. Serotyping of E. coli
3.6. Antimicrobial Susceptibility
3.7. Ethics statement
3.8. Statistical Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Detection of Toxins and CFs
| Isolate ID No. | Enterotoxin Type | CFA/CS | HEp-2 cell Adherence Pattern | Serotype |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | st | - | NA | Escherichia coli O117:HNM |
| 013 | st | CS2 | DA | E. coli O86:H18 |
| 014 | lt | CS3 | DA | E. coli O8:H9 |
| 015 | st | - | NA | E. coli ORough:HNM |
| 034 | lt | - | NA | E. coli OUT:HNM |
| 140 | st | CFA/I | DA | E. coli O15:H11 |
| 189 | st/lt | CS2/CS3 | DA | E. coli O8:H9 |
| 190 | st/lt | CS3/CS2 | DA | E. coli O8:H9 |
| 234 | st | - | NA | E. coli O86:H30 |
| 283 | st | - | NA | E. coli ORough:HNM |
| 290 | lt | - | NA | E. coli O9:HUT |
| 297 | lt | - | NA | E. coli O9:HUT |
| 344 | st/lt | CS2/CS3 | DA | E. coli O8:H9 |
| 345 | st/lt | CS2/CS3 | DA | E. coli O8:H9 |
| 354 | lt | - | NA | E. coli OUT:HNM |
| 361 | lt | - | NA | E. coli OUT:HNM |
Abbreviations: DA, diffuse adherence; NA, nonadherence; CFA/I, colonization factor antigen I; CS2, coli surface 2; CS3, coli surface 3; HNM, flagellar and nonmotile; HUT, flagellar and untypeable; OUT, O-untypeable
4.2. Demographic and Seasonal Distribution of ETEC
4.3. Determination of Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns of ETEC Strains
| ETEC Toxin Type | Total Number of Strains | Antibiotic Resistance Profile | Frequency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | Percentage | |||
| St | 6 | AMX | 1 | 16.7 |
| AMX, AUG | 1 | 16.7 | ||
| AUG, CEPH | 1 | 16.7 | ||
| NAL, AMX, AUG, CEPH, CEFU | 1 | 16.7 | ||
| NAL, CIP, AMX, AUG, CEPH, CEFU | 2 | 33.3 | ||
| Lt | 6 | AMX, AUG | 1 | 16.7 |
| AMX, AUG, CEPH | 3 | 50.0 | ||
| AMX, AUG, CEPH, CEFU | 2 | 33.3 | ||
| st/lt | 4 | AMX, AUG, CEPH | 3 | 75.0 |
| NAL, CIP, AMX, AUG, CEPH, CEFU | 1 | 25.0 | ||
The antibiotic resistance profiles showed that 2 (33.3%) out of 3 ETEC strains with resistance patterns of NAL, nalidixic acid; CIP, ciprofloxacin; AMX, amoxicillin; AUG, augmentin; CEPH, cephalexin; CEFU, cefuroxime to 6 out of 7 tested antibiotics possessed ST toxin type, whereas the remainder possessed ST/LT toxin
