2.1. Study Design
This study was conducted as a narrative literature review based on a comprehensive, nonsystematic search of the available scientific literature. Relevant studies were identified using predefined keywords across major databases, and articles were selected based on their relevance to ceramide metabolism and cardiometabolic outcomes. The study selection process was guided by inclusion and exclusion criteria to ensure relevance and scientific quality; however, no formal systematic review protocol or meta-analysis framework was applied.
2.2. Search Strategy
A broad literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar to identify relevant studies published up to January 2026. The search used a combination of MeSH terms and free-text keywords related to ceramide metabolism and cardiometabolic disease, including "ceramide," "sphingolipid metabolism," "natural compounds," "phytochemicals," "metabolic syndrome," "cardiovascular disease," "insulin resistance," "lipotoxicity," and "oxidative stress." Boolean operators (AND/OR) were used to refine and combine search terms.
The search strategy was designed to ensure broad coverage of the available literature; however, no formal systematic review protocol or PRISMA framework was applied, consistent with the narrative design of this review. Selected elements of the PRISMA guidelines were used to enhance transparency in study identification and selection; however, no full systematic review protocol was followed, consistent with the narrative design of this review. During manuscript revision, additional relevant studies and mechanistic references identified within the original predefined search timeframe, up to January 2026, were incorporated to improve the completeness and contextual interpretation of the evidence. The increase in the number of cited studies reflects both the inclusion of newly screened references within the predefined timeframe and the separation of previously grouped citations into individual references to improve clarity and accuracy. No literature published after January 2026 was intentionally included in the narrative synthesis.
2.3. Eligibility Criteria
Studies were selected based on their relevance to ceramide metabolism and the effects of natural compounds on cardiometabolic outcomes. Eligible studies included preclinical cellular and animal studies and human clinical research investigating polyphenols, flavonoids, alkaloids, and isoflavones in relation to ceramide synthesis, degradation, or signaling pathways. Only peer-reviewed, full-text articles published in English were considered. Studies were required to provide quantitative data or mechanistic insights relevant to ceramide biology and cardiometabolic regulation.
Studies focusing exclusively on synthetic pharmacological agents; non-peer-reviewed publications, including editorials, letters, and case reports; and studies without specific ceramide-related outcomes were excluded to ensure methodological relevance and conceptual consistency.
A formal study quality assessment using standardized tools, such as the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale or Cochrane risk-of-bias tools, was not performed because this work was designed as a narrative literature review rather than a systematic review. This should be considered when interpreting the findings, particularly with respect to interstudy heterogeneity and methodological variability.
2.4. Study Selection
The initial literature search identified 1,432 records. After removal of 312 duplicates, 1,120 titles and abstracts were screened for relevance to ceramide metabolism and cardiometabolic outcomes. At this stage, studies were excluded if they were clearly unrelated to the topic of interest.
Full-text screening was conducted for 164 articles. Of these, 97 studies were excluded because they lacked specific ceramide-related outcomes, lacked relevant natural-compound interventions, or provided insufficient mechanistic or quantitative information regarding ceramide metabolism. Ultimately, 67 studies, including preclinical, clinical, and mechanistic reports, were included in the narrative synthesis.
2.5. Data Extraction
Relevant information was extracted from the included studies to support a narrative synthesis of the literature. Extracted data included the study design and experimental model (cellular, animal, or human); characteristics of the natural compounds, including type, source, dose, duration, and route of administration; and reported effects on ceramide metabolism, including total and species-specific ceramide levels, enzymatic pathways, and signaling mechanisms. Additional information on metabolic and cardiovascular outcomes, as well as key mechanistic findings, was also collected.
2.6. Data Synthesis
A qualitative narrative synthesis was conducted because of heterogeneity in study designs, interventions, and reported outcomes. Studies were organized thematically based on the class of natural compounds, including polyphenols, flavonoids, alkaloids, and isoflavones; the primary ceramide-related pathways investigated, including de novo synthesis, sphingomyelinase activity, and ceramidase regulation; and reported metabolic and cardiovascular effects.
2.7. Methodological Considerations
No formal quality scoring or risk-of-bias assessment was performed, in accordance with the narrative design of this review. To enhance methodological transparency regarding the translational evidence, an additional summary table describing key methodological characteristics of the principal clinical studies was included. This table summarizes sample size, study design, control type, blinding status, intervention duration, and principal cardiometabolic outcomes. However, no formal risk-of-bias scoring system was applied because of the narrative nature of the review. Interpretation of the findings was based on the clarity and relevance of reported methodologies, including the use of validated ceramide measurement techniques, appropriate experimental controls, and clearly defined outcome measures. Considerable heterogeneity was observed across studies in terms of design, population, and analytical methods; therefore, the findings should be interpreted with caution.