Based on the results of this study, TRPG had a strong correlation with systolic PAP, diastolic PAP, and mPAP. Moreover, PRPG was strongly correlated with diastolic PAP and mPAP but not with systolic PAP. Therefore, ECG can be concluded to be a proper tool for the diagnosis of PH. To the best of our knowledge, mPAP is an important hemodynamic indicator for the detection and management of PH, which is commonly determined by an invasive procedure known as right heart catheterization. Obviously, a non-invasive method capable of estimating mPAP is always preferred, especially for the serial or repeated evaluation of mPAP (
13). Although the use of a non-invasive tool is suggested in many guidelines (
14,
15), there are insufficient data on the non-invasive quantification of mPAP. Accordingly, few studies have addressed the reliability of echocardiographic examination. There are various techniques for the assessment of left ventricular function. However, they are not applicable to the RV due to their complex geometry, thin wall, and various contraction patterns.
Our results were indicative of a strong correlation between TRPG and mPAP. Similarly, Shiino et al. (
13) reported a good correlation between these two variables. However, the correlation obtained between TRPG and negative peak strain (RV-PS) in the mentioned study was not as strong. They concluded RV-PS as a proper indicator for the detection of increased mPAP in patients with chronic thromboembolic PH. Moreover, in the mentioned study, a correlation was observed between TRPG and peak pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP). Moreover, a study was conducted by Yin et al. (
16) on the accuracy of echocardiography as used to determine an estimate sPAP. They confirmed a strong correlation between sPAP and right ventricular systolic pressure, as measured by catheterization. However, the correlation between sPAP measured by catheterization and sPAP using echocardiography was relatively weak. The accuracy of echocardiography was estimated at 57.5% for sPAP.
However, the findings obtained by Rich et al. (
17) were suggestive of the inaccuracy of the echocardiographic estimation of PASP. Therefore, they recommended not to rely on this modality for the establishment of PH diagnosis. Consequently, RV-PS is a more proper maker for the detection of elevated mPAP in comparison to PASP as an echocardiographic parameter. The RV function in the clinical setting is determined by different conventional echocardiographic parameters, like tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, RV fractional area change, RV index of myocardial performance, and tricuspid annular peak systolic velocity (
18). Although the assessment of regional left ventricular function by echocardiography is a common procedure, recently, regional RV function has also been evaluated by this approach (
19,
20). Given that systolic longitudinal deformation is determined by peak systolic strain, a reduction of this indicator can reflect RV dysfunction.
In a study carried out by Ikeda et al. (
21) peak systolic strain, post-systolic strain index, TRPG, and end-diastolic diameter were correlated with mPAP and PVR. They suggested peak systolic strain as the only independent predictor for mPAP and PVR. Kasai et al. (
22) evaluated different echocardiography-derived prediction indices using direct right heart catheterization to identify the most reliable non-invasive indicator of PVR in patients with chronic thromboembolic PH. In the mentioned study, the highest correlation was observed between TRPG, as an echocardiographic parameter, and PVR assessed by the right heart catheterization. Moreover, PVR was also correlated with tricuspid regurgitation (
22). The PVR can be predicted by means of echocardiography via various formulas. The right heart catheterization involves the calculation of PVR equation, while echocardiography facilitates the measurement of RV stroke volume (
22).
In confirmation of our findings, Greiner et al. (
23), investigating a large sample size, showed a strong correlation between mPAP in ECG and cardiac catheterization. Their results were also indicative of the high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of ECG tool for the diagnosis of PH. However, the results of a cohort study conducted on patients with advanced lung disease showed that half of the patients were false positive for PH as determined by echocardiography. It seems that the factors related to chronic pulmonary disease may have influenced the findings and limited the accurate measurement of the tricuspid regurgitation jet (
24). In our study, only one case with pulmonary problems was reported.
The overestimation and underestimation of PAP in the subjects assessed for PH may also suggest the inaccuracy of echocardiography (
17,
25,
26). This issue has been assessed in three recent meta-analyses. Based on the obtained results, the mean time interval between echocardiography and right heart catheterization ranged between two hours and 90 days. Although one of the meta-analyses indicated the low accuracy of echocardiographic findings, they all reported a high diagnostic sensitivity for this procedure. However, the calculated specificity varied among the studies (
27-
29). Wang et al. (
30) confirmed high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of RV systolic pressure in ECG as a diagnostic tool for the detection of PH. On the other hand, Hua et al. (
31) reported the high diagnostic value of SPAP, a factor assessed by ECG.
In a study by Kim et al. (
32), a strong correlation was found between RV systolic in ECG findings and PA systolic in cardiac catheterization. They also reported high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for ECG parameters in detecting patients with PH. Moreover, Hammerstingl et al. (
33) detected a high correlation between echocardiography and cardiac catheterization findings. Although annual echocardiographic screening is suggested for the early diagnosis and management of PAH (
14), the high sensitivity and specificity of this tool for diagnosing PH have not been proven yet (
34).
5.1. Research Limitations
Some of the limitations of the current study include the low sample size, incomplete data, and lack of access to some samples due to the retrospective nature of the research. Therefore, it is suggested to perform further multicenter studies with a larger sample size to investigate the reliability and applicability of using echocardiography for the diagnosis of PH in the pediatric population.
5.2. Conclusions
Echocardiographic approach is a safe and sensitive method for diagnosis of primary pulmonary hypertension. According to the results of the present study, there is a strong correlation between mean PAP and two variables of TRPG and PRPG. Moreover, TRPG was found to correlate with systolic and diastolic PAP.