Spine is the most common site of bone metastases, and it is very essential to differentiate metastatic lesions from benign ones in patients with cancer (
1). Although conventional MRI plays a fundamental role in the evaluation of bone tumors, its specificity is limited. For example, T1 weighted images may show benign lesions similar to malignancies as in our study all metastatic lesions and all acute CFs were hypointense in T1WI. As a result, it is difficult to distinguish malignancy based on T1-weighted images alone, which is in agreement with studies conducted by Zidan et al. (
9) and Martel Villagran et al. (
10). Therefore, more accurate diagnosis in MRI needs supplemental techniques.
DWI showed that out of 14 acute benign CFs (osteoporotic or acute traumatic), 9 were hypointense, 3 were hyperintense and 2 lesions showed isointense signal intensity (compared with the signal intensity of normal bone marrow). Among the hemangioma lesions, out of 11 lesions, 9 were hypointense and 2 were hyperintense. All metastatic lesions were hyperintense in DWI except 4 lesions that can be blastic ones. In the present study, some of benign lesions were hyperintense that can be attributed to the T2 effect (
Figure 2). The findings of this study were concordant with studies carried out by Abodewan et al. (
7) and Ballio et al. (
5), while they differed from that reported by Turna et al.; (
11) they stated that the majority of benign CF showed hyperintense on DW images, which might due to the use of lower b-value or different sequence.
Male patient, 87 years old with hemangioma. A, Sagittal T1-weighted and B, STIR and C, DWI images revealed the hemangioma hyperintense. D, Sagittal opposed phase and E, in phase show low signal intensity ratio (0.75). F, ADC map shows a high apparent coefficient by ADC value of 1.58 × 10-3mm2/s, which confirmed the benignity nature of the lesion.
Similar to Zidan et al. and Tadros et al., we applied 3 diffusion sensitizing gradients with b-values of 0, 50, and 800 mm
2/s. The average values of minimum, mean, and max ADC for malignant lesions were 0.564 ± 0.142 × 10
-3 mm
2/s, 0.933 ± 0.255 × 10
-3 mm
2/s, and 1.348 ± 0.289 × 10
-3 mm
2/s and the same value for benign lesions were 0.794 ± 0.121 × 10
-3 mm
2/s, 1.399 ± 0.229 × 10
-3mm
2/s, and 1.713 ± 0.286 × 10
-3 mm
2/s. The findings of the current study on ADC mean were similar to Abo Dewan et al. (
7), but this study had some limitations in this comparison, since the number of CFs was small and we did not have inflammatory/infective lesions.
The present study showed that ADC values of benign lesions were definitely higher than malignant lesions, which was concordant with studies conducted by Balliu et al. (
5), Abo Dewan et al. (
7), and Zidan et al. (
9).
In contrast of this study, Turna et al. (
11) and Maeda et al. (
12) stated that ADC values are not useful in differentiating benign and malignant lesions because of existing some overlap. This controversy might be related to technical variances between studies and different disease stages (ADC value of chronic compression fracture may be similar to malignant lesions).
In agreement with the current study, Chan et al. (
13) showed a statistically significant difference between the ADC values of acute benign and malignant fracture. They found no overlap between their ADC values, while we found some overlap. In this study, 4 metastatic lesions showed ADC minimum, mean, and maximum higher than cut-off point value that can be due to blastic metastasis or existence of fibrous tissue in the metastases.
In this research, we added in/opposed phase image to conventional and diffusion sequences. We expressed the changes that occurred in the signal intensity of normal and abnormal marrow by SIR. SIR is the marrow mean signal intensity on the opposed phase to the marrow mean signal intensity on the in phase images. Using this formula, which was also used for other studies, we calculated a mean signal intensity ratio of 1.155 ± 0.183 for the metastatic group and 0.649 ± 0.341 for the benign group and 0.45 ± 0.113 for normal group. We found that SIR in the malignant lesions are definitely higher than normal and benign ones (
Figures 3 and
4). These results were supported by Ogura et al. (
14) and Tadros et al. (
15), but differed from that reported by Geith et al. (
16), who stated that the osteoporotic lesions showed hyperintense signal on opposed phase image. They founded no statistically significant difference in SI on the opposed-phase images of benign and malignant vertebral lesions. They reported a sensitivity of only 50% and a specificity of 88.5%. This disagreement might be due to this fact that an equal amount of fat and water is not always present in benign lesion because of edema. It results in more or less hyperintensity on the opposed-phase images.
Female patient with acute benign CF. A, B, C: (T1 and T2 WI and DWI) show traumatic fracture in L2 vertebral body. The lesion reveals low signal in T1 and high signal in STIR and DWI.D, E, F: (ADC map and out of phase and in phase) display high signal on ADC map with high min, mean ,max ADC values ( 0.67, 1.33 and 1.88 × 10-3 mm2/s) and low SIR (0.54).
Female patient, 43 years old with breast neoplasm. Metastatic CF in L3 and metastatic lesion in T12. A, Sagittal FSE T1 WI shows both lesions hypointense. B, C: (STIR and DWI) reveal the lesions hyperintense. D, ADC map display low ADC values. E, F: (opposed phase and in-phase) show high SIR (1.13 (L3) and 1.34 (T12)) that improve malignant nature of lesions.
Also, some overlap occurred in this study; 4 benign lesions had a ratio greater than 0.92 and 5 malignant lesions had a value less than 0.92; these results were in agreement with Zidan et al. (
17) and Swartz et al. (
18) The false-positive result may be due to massive bone marrow edema with abundant water that did not show signal dropout on opposed phase images. The false-negative results may be due to densely sclerotic metastasis that showed susceptibility artifact on opposed phase sequence or fat containing metastases.
Using ROC analysis, the optimal SIR cutoff value for separating benign and malignant lesions was found to be 0.92 which quite similar to Zidan, but less than the cutoff value of one reported by El-Samie et al. (
14).
In the current study, an SIR cutoff value of 0.92 was able to differentiate benign and malignant lesions with 90.5% sensitivity, 88% specificity, and 92% accuracy. These results were in agreement with Zidan et al. (
17), who reported 93% sensitivity and 82% specificity, and with Martel Vilagran et al. (
10), who reported 97% sensitivity, 80.1% specificity, and 83.2% accuracy.
The results of this study showed that the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of diffusion weighted imaging almost were comparable to those calculated for chemical shift imaging.
4.1. Conclusions
Quantitative diffusion weighted and chemical shift MR imaging are effective non-invasive technique in differentiating benign from malignant vertebral bone marrow lesions, which provide additional information to the routine MRI sequences. These techniques have an important role in diagnosis, characterization, and differentiation of benign and malignant vertebral bone marrow lesions.