Effects of PRO, CLZ on insulin secretion from pancreatic islets
The rate of insulin secretion (microU/ islet/60 min) from isolated islets were decreased significantly in the presence of 500 μM H
2O
2 (1.47 ± 0.15 and 4.09 ± 0.13) in comparison with control group, (2.26 ± 0.16 and 6.84 ± 0.17) in basal (
Figure 1A) and stimulatory (
Figure 1B) glucose medium, respectively (P < 0.001). Also insulin secretion showed a significant increase in pretreated groups with CLZ (2.16 ± 0.15), (P < 0.01), GLB (3.65 ± 0.16) and PRO+CLZ (3.41 ± 0.14), (P < 0.001) compared to H
2O
2 group in basal glucose medium (
Figure 1A). Furthermore a remarkable increase in insulin secretion was observed at the stimulatory glucose medium (
Figure 1B) in groups which pretreated with PRO and GLB (4.83 ± 0.16 and 4.75 ± 0.17 respectively), (P < 0.01), CLZ and PRO+CLZ (5.99 ± 0.15 and 6.56 ± 0.16 respectively) (P < 0.001), compared with H
2O
2 alone.
48 h Pretreatment effects of progesterone (PRO. 0.5 μM), cilostazol (CLZ. 10 μM), PRO and CLZ together, Glibenclamide (GLB. 10 μM) on insulin secretion from mice isolated pancreatic islets after 2 h exposure of islets to H2O2 (500 μM) and subsequent 1 h incubation with 2.8 mM (A) or 16.7 mM (B) glucose containing medium. (7 mice in each group). Results are expressed as mean ± SEM.
Pancreatic islets MDA levels
MDA levels (nmol/mg protein) following incubation of islets with 500 μM H
2O
2 increased significantly (P < 0.001) compared to control group in 16.7 mM glucose medium. Also 48 h treatment of islets with PRO+CLZ and GLB decreased (P < 0.001) MDA level as compared to H
2O
2 group in 2.8 mM glucose medium (Table 1). Relative to H
2O
2 group in 16.7 mM glucose medium, significant decrease in MDA level were observed (P < 0.001) in all pretreatment groups. The effect of PRO+CLZ was better than other groups (
Table 2).
| Enzyme | Catalas activity (U/mg Protein) | SOD activity (U/mg Protein) | MDA (nmol/mg Protein) |
|---|
| Groups |
|---|
| Control | 4/06 ± /18 | 37/96 ± 4/9 | 6/22 ± /08 |
| H2O2 | 1/5 ± /12 *** | 17/66 ± 3/6 *** | 9/8 ± /17 *** |
| H2O2+ GLB | 3/12 ± /12 ***### | 31/31 ± 5 *### | 7 ± /199 ### |
| H2O2+ PRO | 2/05 ± /11 ***# | 25/03 ± 3/9 *** | 8/2 ± /19 ***### |
| H2O2+ CLZ | 2/53 ± /1 ***### | 27/69 ± 3/5 ***## | 7/8 ± /13 ***### |
| H2O2+ CLZ + PRO | 3/54 ± /15 *### | 36/67 ± 4/44 ### | 4/6 ± /2 ***### |
(P<0.05) and
(P<0.001) vs. control group.
(P<0.05) and
(P<0.01) and
(P<0.001) vs. H2O2 group.
Pancreatic islets CAT levels
According to acquired results, after addition of high and basal glucose mediums to H
2O
2 group, CAT activity of islet tissues (unit/mg protein) decreased significantly compared to control groups (P < 0.001). Under 2.8 mM glucose, all pretreated drugs were able to increase (P < 0.001) CAT activity relative to H
2O
2 group (Table 1). After addition of 16.7 mM glucose medium, remarkably increase in CAT activity was observed in PRO pretreated (P < 0.05), and also other pretreated groups (P < 0.001) in comparison with H
2O
2 group (
Table 2).
Pancreatic islets SOD levels
After addition of 2.8 mM glucose (Table 1) and also 16.7 mM glucose containing mediums (
Table 2), islets SOD activity (unit/mg protein) of negative control group, significantly decreased compared to control group (P < 0.001). Following the addition of basal glucose medium (Table 1), significant improvement of SOD activity was shown in PRO (P < 0.01) and other pretreatment groups (P < 0.001) compared to H
2O
2 group. Pretreatment with CLZ (P < 0.01), PRO+CLZ and GLB (P < 0.001), increased SOD activity in the stimulatory glucose medium (
Table 2) compared to H
2O
2 group.
In this study, H
2O
2 is used as a substitute of ROS for evaluation of ROS effects on islet cells function. This model has also been used widely in previous researches for assessing the role of ROS (
26). In our investigation, exposure of mice islets to H
2O
2 significantly decreased insulin release from them after addition of 2.8 mM and also 16.7 mM glucose mediums. Our findings are consistent with Xiong and
et al. report (
18) which showed that H
2O
2 damages islet cells and subsequent decreases their insulin secretion. The present study also exhibited that pretreatment of H
2O
2 -induced damaged islets with PRO, increased insulin secretion. In agreement with our study, Shao and
et al. reported that PRO stimulates insulin secretion in MIN6 β-cells (
27). Also similar excitatory effect on insulin secretion has been achieved by Hollew and
et al. after 20 h incubation of rat islets with PRO (
28). However, Sorenson and
et al. have shown the inhibitory effect of PRO on insulin secretion from neonatal rat islets (
9). Although the accurate cause of this differential response to PRO is not apparent, but it may result from the different kinds of islets that have been studied. In the medium culture, neonatal islets may not be able to respond efficiently to glucose stimulation for insulin secretion and this procedure perhaps is due to immaturity of the metabolic system of neonatal pancreatic beta cells (
29).
Also in our study pretreatment with CLZ remarkably increased insulin secretion as compared with H2O2 group. The present study showed that combined pretreatment of PRO and CLZ has a stronger effect on insulin secretion from islets.
Because of the vulnerability of pancreatic islets to oxidative damage, exposure of them to ROS can activate several cellular stress-sensitive pathways that have been linked to decreased insulin secretion (
30). Our results in this study showed that H
2O
2 as a substitute of ROS, decreased insulin output of pancreatic islets by induction of oxidative stress. Administration of compounds with antioxidant properties can augment the defense capacity of islet cells to deal with oxidative stress (
31). Likely pretreatment of islets with CLZ or PRO, to some extent restored secretary function of islets through potentiating of islets antioxidant defense system. On the other hand combination of CLZ and PRO represent higher antioxidant properties and so better preserve islets function.
The rate of lipid peroxidation and destruction of the cell membrane was assayed by evaluation of MDA level (
32). At this study, expose to H
2O
2 (as an oxidative stress inducer) significantly increased the MDA level of islet cells of H2O2 group after addition of stimulatory concentration of glucose medium in comparison with the control group.
Also several studies which have investigated the toxicity effects of Interleukin1-β, tumor necrosis factor-α and interferon gamma on isolated islets of rats and human, demonstrated that this cytokine mixture induced significant increases in MDA and decreases in insulin content in islets. In addition, an antioxidant compound (lazaroid U78518E) inhibited this cytokine effects, decreased MDA level and increased insulin of islets (
33,
34)
Our findings indicated that the islets MDA level in 16.7 mM glucose medium was higher compared to 2.8 mM glucose medium. It is probably because high concentration of glucose, itself leads to increased ROS production, oxidative damage, as well as cell toxicity. Subsequently this results in more lipid peroxidation and higher MDA generation (
35).
Also pretreatment with PRO+CLZ reduced lipid peroxidation and MDA generation in islet cells after addition of 16.7 mM glucose medium and this may partly protect the islets against H2O2-induced damage. Pretreatment with PRO+CLZ resulted in more decrease in lipid peroxidation and thus further resistance of islets cells versus free radical damages rather than alone pretreatment of them.
Our results showed that in H
2O
2 group, the antioxidant enzyme activities including SOD and CAT significantly decreased relative to control groups and this pointed to the oxidative effect of H
2O
2 in islet cells. Markus and
et al. have indicated to similar effect of H
2O
2 on insulin - producing RINm5F cells, and also cited that over expression of these antioxidant enzymes, reduced H2O2 – mediated toxicity in these cells (
36).
In another study, Lortz and
et al. investigated the combination effect of IL-1β, TNF-α and IFN-γ on insulin-producing RINm5F cells. They showed that this compound significantly decreased cell viability. Over expression of cytoprotective enzymes such as CAT and SOD protected against toxicity of the cytokine mixture due to inactivation of generated ROS in this cells (
37).
Pretreatment with PRO and CLZ elevated CAT activity as compared with H2O2 group. Also pretreatment with CLZ alone or with PRO, improved the SOD activity relative to H2O2 group after addition of 16.7 mM and 2.8 mM glucose medium. However after addition of basal or stimulatory glucose mediums in our investigation, combined of PRO and CLZ has stronger effect than single pretreatment of them on antioxidant enzymes activities. As observed in this study, the PRO+CLZ effect on lipid peroxidation as well as their antioxidant effect was more impressive than single pretreatment of them.
It has also been demonstrated that increase in intracellular cyclic nucleotides such as cAMP, could decrease reactive oxygen generation, oxidative stress and subsequent development of cellular dysfunction (
14). On the other hand, as mentioned previously, PRO and CLZ probably by elevation of cyclic AMP and also activation of enzymes such as PK-A, could potentiate the cell defense systems against oxidative stress. Apparently, simultaneous pretreatment of PRO and CLZ rather than alone pretreatment of them, create a higher cAMP level, and thereby stronger antioxidant properties as well as more protective effects following oxidative damages in pancreatic islets.
The main limitation in this work is the loss of some intact islets at the end of isolation procedure due to the unavoidable prolonged time necessary for islet isolation.
In conclusion, the present study showed the protective effects of PRO and CLZ against H2O2 induced oxidative damage in pancreatic islets. Based on the results of our study, this effect might be mediated through a reduction of lipid peroxidation and elevation of antioxidant enzyme activities. Anyway, further studies seem required to determine the precise molecular mechanism (s) by which combination of these drugs, affect on pancreatic islets.