The analysis of medical records of the study group (n = 228) demonstrated an obvious predominance of boys, with 147 (64.75%), while the number of girls was 81 (35.25%). There was a prevalence of mild (50.5%) and moderate (43%) courses of coronavirus infection, while severe cases were documented in 6.5% of instances. The relationship between age and the course of COVID-19 revealed a clear dominance of adolescent children in all clinical variants of the disease.
The polymorphism and non-specificity of clinical manifestations in children were revealed. In clinical syndromology, cough (75.5%), sneezing and rhinorrhea (35.5%), and dyspnea (10%) were noted with the highest frequency in the respiratory system. In the gastrointestinal tract, appetite disorders (30%), diarrhea (29.75%), and vomiting and nausea (21.75%) were noted. There were symptoms of intoxication: Weakness (57.75%), headache (35%), anxiety, and sleep disorders (33.75%) together with fever. In fewer clinical observations, symptoms such as dizziness (7.25%), enanthema (5.75%), and convulsions (3.75%) were described. Olfactory disorders occurred in children only in 2.5% of cases.
Regarding the cardiovascular system, tachycardia was observed in 74%, cardiac pain in 9.25%, and increased BP in 7.25% of cases. Cardiovascular changes were observed in the acute period of the disease, occurring at the height of intoxication with subsequent rapid relief. The connection of cardiologic symptoms with the severity of the disease was not revealed.
The results of laboratory indicators indicate no specific hematologic modifications. In some cases, there was an increase in white blood cells (WBCs) and lymphocytes, along with an acceleration of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). However, average hemogram indicators in all age groups were within reference values and corresponded to the hematologic reaction to a viral infection. At the second stage, 228 children with a history of COVID-19 were examined. The control group consisted of 172 children with epidemiologically confirmed exposure and respiratory symptoms, but without laboratory confirmation of COVID-19. All children underwent clinical and laboratory examinations, including the collection of complaints, anamnestic data, objective examination, BP measurement, CBC, urinalysis, and ECG (
Table 2).
| Symptoms | Main Group (N = 228) | Control Group (N = 172) |
|---|
| 4 - 7 (N = 53) | 8 - 11 (N = 25) | 12 - 15 (N = 63) | 16 - 18 (N = 87) | 4 - 7 (N = 34) | 8 - 11 (N = 29) | 12 - 15 (N = 33) | 16 - 18 (N = 76) |
|---|
| Cardiac pain | - | 2 (8) | 4 (6.3) | 6 (6.8) | - | - | 1 (3) | 1 (1.3) |
| Dysrhythmia | - | 3 (12) | 5 (7.9) | 7 (8) | - | 1 (3.4) | 1 (3) | 1 (1.3) |
| Increased fatigue | - | 2 (8) | 4 (6.3) | 4 (4.5) | - | - | 1 (3) | 2 (2.6) |
| Sternal discomfort | - | 1 (4) | 2 (3.2) | 2 (2.3) | - | - | - | 1 (1.3) |
| Incomplete inhalation feeling | - | 1 (4) | 3 (4.7) | 5 (5.7) | - | - | - | 2 (2.6) |
| Reccurent abdominal pain | - | 2 (8) | 3 (4.7) | 5 (5.7) | - | 1 (3.4) | 1 (3) | - |
| Pulsing headache with nausea | - | - | 2 (3.2) | 6 (6.8) | - | - | 1 (3) | 2 (2.6) |
| Poor tolerance to physical activity | - | 3 (12) | 4 (6.3) | 7 (8) | - | - | - | 2 (2.6) |
| Cold hands | - | 4 (16) | 3 (4.7) | 5 (5.7) | - | 1 (3.4) | 1 (3) | 1 (1.3) |
| Allergicreactions (angioedema, urticaria) | 5 (9.4) | 2 (8) | 1 (1.5) | 5 (5.7) | - | - | 1 (3) | 2 (2.6) |
| Palm hyperhidrosis | - | 1 (4) | 3 (4.7) | 4 (4.5) | - | - | 1 (3) | 1 (1.3) |
| Tendencytoskinredness | - | 3 (12) | 5 (7.9) | 7 (8) | - | - | 2 (6) | 2 (2.6) |
a Values are expressed as No. (%).
As can be seen from
Table 2, adolescents in the main group more often had complaints of cardiac pain, arrhythmia, increased fatigue, and poor tolerance to physical activity. Hematologic parameters of both groups corresponded to reference values, and there was no significant difference in mean values between the groups. Analysis of the average heart rate in the main and control groups showed compliance with reference values. Comparative data of ECG parameters are presented in
Table 3.
| Age Groups (y) | Heart Rate (Main Group) | Heart Rate (Control Group) | Р-Value | Р Wave (Main Group) | Р Wave (Control Group) | Р-Value | PQ (Main Group) | PQ (Control Group) | Р-Value | Qrs (Main Group) | Qrs (Control Group) | Р-Value | QT (Main Group) | QT (Control Group) | Р-Value |
|---|
| 4 - 7 | 103 (100 - 117.5) | 100 (96 - 120) | 0.2 | 0.07 (0.06 - 0.08) | 0.08 (0.06 - 0.08) | 0.59 | 0.12 (0.12 - 0.14) | 0.12 (0.12 - 0.14) | 0.66 | 0.06 (0.06 - 0.075) | 0.06 (0.06 - 0.08) | 0.48 | 0.36 (0.36 - 0.375) | 0.36 (0.36 - 0.36) | 0.63 |
| 8 - 11 | 91.5 (84.5 - 100.75) | 90 (88 - 111) | 0.27 | 0.08 (0.06 - 0.08) | 0.08 (0.06 - 0.08) | 0.57 | 0.13 (0.12 - 0.145) | 0.135 (0.12 - 0.14) | 0.85 | 0.06 (0.06 - 0.07) | 0.06 (0.06 - 0.06) | 0.3 | 0.36 (0.36 - 0.36) | 0.36 (0.36 - 0.36) | 0.75 |
| 12 - 15 | 90 (78 - 100) | 86 (79 - 96) | 0.56 | 0.08 (0.06 - 0.08) | 0.08 (0.06 - 0.08) | 0.36 | 0.13 (0.10 - 0.16) | 0.14 (0.12 - 0.16) | 0.83 | 0.06 (0.06 - 0.08) | 0.06 (0.06 - 0.065) | 0.33 | 0.36 (0.36 - 0.38) | 0.36 (0.36 - 0.375) | 0.74 |
| 16 - 18 | 78 (70 - 88) | 76 (70 - 86) | 0.67 | 0.08 (0.06 - 0.08) | 0.08 (0.06 - 0.08) | 0.38 | 0.13 (0.11 - 0.16) | 0.14 (0.12 - 0.16) | < 0.05 | 0.08 (0.06 - 0.08) | 0.06 (0.06 - 0.08) | 0.18 | 0.36 (0.36 - 0.36) | 0.36 (0.36 - 0.38) | 0.88 |
As can be seen from
Table 3, the main parameters of waves and intervals were within reference values. However, 14 children (9.3%) aged 12 - 18 years in the main group exhibited relative shortening of the PQ interval, while in the control group, only 6 (5.5%) children showed this. Comparative data of BP for the main and control groups are presented in
Table 4.
| Age Groups (y) | Main Group | Control Group |
|---|
| SBP | DBP | SBP | DBP |
|---|
| 4 - 7 | 100 (92.5 - 110) | 60 (60 - 70) | 107 (100 - 114) | 60 (60 - 70) |
| 8 - 11 | 113 (106 - 118) | 68 (62 - 72) | 112 (105 - 118) | 67 (61 - 72) |
| 12 - 15 | 118 (110 - 130)* | 71 (70 - 80) | 115 (109 - 120) | 71 (68 - 80) |
| 16 - 18 | 125 (118 - 135)* | 75 (70 - 84) | 120 (110 - 130) | 73 (70 - 84) |
Abbreviations: SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure.
The BP parameters in both groups are within the limits of age norms. However, as can be seen from
Table 4, there is a tendency for an increase in the main group.
At the final stage of the study, children who exhibited clinical and instrumental signs of cardiovascular disorders (complaints, ECG changes, and BP abnormalities) were examined. The age composition of the described group included preschool (8/20%), school (9/22.5%), and adolescent (23/57.5%) children. The structure of the adolescent group was represented by children aged 12 - 15 years (17/42.5%) and 16 - 18 years (6/15%). Immunoglobulin M (IgM) was not detected in all age groups, indicating the absence of acute illness. The IgG levels were significantly higher than reference values for healthy children, as the immune response leads to an increase in antibody levels, including IgG.
In the group of children aged 4 - 7 years, the average level of IgG is 222.04 g/L, with a reference range of 4 - 9 g/L. This indicates a pronounced immune response. In the group of 8 - 11 years old, the average level of IgG is 121 g/L (standard is 5 - 14 g/L). Compared to other groups, there is a slight decrease. The lowest individual index (47.26 g/L) also belongs to this group, which may indicate a weaker or variable immune response.
In the 12 - 15 years group, the mean IgG level reaches 356.4 g/L (normal is 14 g/L), and the highest recorded figure (994.4 g/L) is also found here. This may indicate an enhanced immune response in this age range. In the 16 - 18 years group, the IgG level averages 480.45 g/L, which is also much higher than the standard (14 g/L). The IgG levels gradually increase with age, reaching a peak in adolescence (12 - 18 years). This may be due to the peculiarities of the formation and maturity of the immune system in children.
Assessment of blood biochemical analysis showed that CRP in all age groups was within reference values, confirming the absence of acute manifestation. Ferritin levels also did not exceed age normative values in any of the studied groups.
When evaluating APTT, no exceeding of reference values was revealed. To illustrate structural and functional changes in the cardiovascular system, cardiac ultrasound was performed in all children (
Table 5). During echocardiography conducted 24 - 36 months after COVID-19, the size of heart cavities, left ventricular ejection fraction, and myocardial thickness in the predominant majority of patients corresponded to the mass-weighted values.
| Variables | 4 - 7 y (N = 8) a | 8 - 11 y (N = 9) a | 12 - 15 y (N = 17) a | 16 - 18 y (N = 6) a |
|---|
| Echocardiography | | | | |
| Ejection fraction | 67 (65 - 68) | 69 (66.5 - 70.5) | 65 (63.5 - 66.0) | 63.5 (62 - 64.0) |
| Mean pulmonary arterial pressure (MPAP) | 24 (21 - 25) | 23 (22 - 24) | 25 (24 - 27) | 26 (24 - 30) |
| 24-hour BP monitoring | | | | |
| Mean SBP | 83 (83 - 85) | 85 (84 - 85.5) | 102 (97.5 - 115) | 103 (92.7 - 110.5) |
| Mean DBP | 60 (50 - 63) | 60 (58 - 61) | 65 (52 - 67) | 60 (57.5 - 66.7) |
| Night-time decrease SBP | 10 (10 - 10) | 10 (6.9 - 11) | 8.2 (6.9 - 9.8) | 5.8 (3.0 - 7.0) |
| Night-time decrease DBP | 10 (10 - 11) | 10 (1.7 - 11) | 12 (10.5 - 12) | 6.9 (2.7 - 10) |
| Mean 24-hour SBP | 84 (82 - 85) | 84 (83 - 84.5) | 99 (95.5 - 105.5) | 101.5 (91 - 119) |
| Mean 24-hour DBP | 59 (49 - 60) | 59 (55 - 60) | 60 (59.5 - 60.5) | 61 (55.2 - 70) |
| Mean pulse BP | 30 (27 - 30) | 29 (28.5 - 30) | 40 (33 - 43.5) | 39.5 (35 - 48) |
| 24-hour ECG monitoring | | | | |
| Daytime heart rate | 95 (91 - 111) | 88 (86 - 102) | 93 (84 - 96.5) | 82.5 (78.2 - 91.7) |
| Night time heart rate | 75 (69 - 82) | 65 (62 - 77) | 75 (69.5 - 80) | 56 (53.2 - 68.2) |
| PQ | 0.15 (0.12 - 0.16) | 0.12 (0.12 - 0.15) | 0.14 (0.14 - 0.15) | 0.17 (0.15 - 0.23) |
| QT | 361 (332 - 388) | 391 (371 - 411) | 386 (367 - 418) | 383 (379 - 396) |
| QT corrigated | 438 (420 - 449) | 416 (405 - 428) | 425 (415 - 435) | 413 (393 - 428) |
Abbreviations: BP, blood pressure; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; ECG, electrocardiogram.
a Q (Q1 - Q3).
When analyzing the echocardiographic examination, the following were detected: An open oval window of 0.2 - 0.3 cm was found in 2 patients (5%) (95% CI: -1.8 to 11.8), and one case (2.5%) with two echo-interruptions of 0.3 and 0.2 cm with discharge from left to right (95% CI: -2.3 to 7.3). In 3 cases (7.5%) (95% CI: -0.7 to 15.7), there was a mitral valve prolapse stage 1. Echocardiography analysis revealed 1 case (2.5%) (95% CI: -2.3 to 7.3) of systolic pulmonary artery pressure (SPAP 32 mmHg) with tricuspid regurgitation of 1.5 mmHg, and 1 child (2.5%) (95% CI: -2.3 to 7.3) had mild left ventricular enlargement. In the last case, there were no clinical manifestations, the ejection fraction was at 71%, and Pro-BNP was within reference values, which was considered a variant of the norm.
Due to BP lability at the previous examination, children underwent 24-hour BP monitoring. It was noted that in the group of children from 4 to 7 years old, the average BP was 85/56 mmHg; in the age group from 8 to 11 years old, it was 86/56 mmHg; and in adolescents, it was 107/64 mmHg (including children from 16 to 18 years old - 100.8/61.8 mmHg). The relative BP decrease in the last group was found due to hypotension of 80/53 mmHg in one child.
Analysis of daily BP dynamics revealed an insufficient night-time decrease in both SBP and DBP in children beginning from school age. At the same time, the percentage of children exhibiting a non-dipper BP profile in the age group from 9 to 11 years was 11.1%, and in adolescents, it was 47.8%, with children up to 15 years at 35.2% and those aged 16 to 18 years at 83.3%. The mean indices of daily ECG monitoring fell within reference values.