The highlight of our study is the finding that D-dimer is a highly sensitive marker for predicting outcomes. D-dimer is a biomarker used to diagnose DIC and pulmonary embolism. It is an easily obtainable test that signifies the stimulation of the coagulation pathway and the complexity of the body’s response and outcome (
6-
8). Sepsis is the most common etiologic factor for DIC in children, with DIC present in almost 30 - 60% of sepsis cases. The sustained activation of the inflammatory and coagulation processes leads to microvascular thrombosis, thereby causing DIC, which can lead to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) and mortality. Hence, it becomes important to detect DIC early and intervene. D-dimer, a marker of coagulation and fibrinolysis, is being studied in children with sepsis (
11).
In a study conducted by Weiss et al. (
12), the highest incidence of sepsis was seen in children under 5 years (43%), followed by those aged 6 - 12 years (26%) and 12 - 18 years (23%), similar to our study. This possibly explains the high mortality rate in children under 5 years of age due to sepsis. Nademi et al. (
13) studied the source of fever in children and found that 41 (29%) children had a serious infection. The most common cause of infection was pneumonia (22%), followed by meningitis. This observation is similar to our study, where the most common cause of sepsis was pneumonia, constituting 25% of the cases.
In our cohort, blood cultures were performed in 66 children, out of which 2 cultures were positive for
Streptococcus pneumoniae, 1 for
Candida, and 1 for
Escherichia coli. Out of the 4 culture-positive sepsis cases, 3 had elevated D-dimer levels. In a study by Alvaro-Meca et al. (
14) on epidemiological trends of sepsis, it was found that the length of hospital stay was high in infants and children under 5 years (21.8 days), compared to older children (5 - 9 years) (10.2 days). Nonetheless, in our study, the median duration of hospital stay in children with sepsis was 8 days, with the maximum stay being 30 days and the minimum stay being 2 days. However, there was no significant difference in the median duration of hospital stay between those with elevated D-dimer (8 days) and those with normal D-dimer (7 days).
In our study, MODS led to mortality in 33% of cases (2 out of 6 MODS cases), which is comparable to another similar study where the mortality was 30% (
15). In 2012, Sharma et al. (
16) conducted a pilot study to determine D-dimer and fibrinogen levels in 50 children with sepsis. It was found that both D-dimer and fibrinogen were significantly increased in patients compared to controls, even though no patient had any clinical features of DIC at admission. Sridhar et al. (
17) conducted a case-control study to determine the role of D-dimer as a marker of DIC in children with dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF). They found that D-dimer levels were significantly higher among those who presented with shock, irrespective of the severity of thrombocytopenia.
In a study done by Li et al. (
18) in elderly patients with sepsis, a combination of D-dimer levels, PaO2/FiO2 levels, and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score were used as prognostic markers in terms of 28-day mortality. It was concluded that each of these variables is a good marker for the prognosis of sepsis.
In the present study, elevated D-dimer levels were compared with outcomes, namely length of hospital stay, length of ICU stay, need for oxygen, mechanical ventilation, mortality, and inotrope requirement, however statistical significance was not evident. However, it is noteworthy that Sharma et al. (
16) studied only the D-dimer positivity rate in patients compared to controls and not the levels. Similarly, in the study by Li et al. (
18), D-dimer levels in association with other factors like PaO
2/FiO
2 levels and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score were studied as outcome predictors, not D-dimer alone. The sensitivity of D-dimer to predict each of the above-mentioned outcomes varied between 70% and 85%; however, it had poor specificity. Therefore, it is better to study D-dimer in association with other biochemical tools or in conjunction with illness severity scores like the pediatric SOFA (pSOFA) to predict outcomes. This approach will ensure early identification of sepsis and its complications and ensure appropriate timely intervention (
19,
20).
The limitation of our study was that a large proportion of cases were in the less severe category — sepsis (76%) — which might have lead to selection bias. The total number of cases in the serious categories (severe sepsis, septic shock, and MODS) constituted 24%. This would have led to falsely low levels of D-dimer, considering the milder illness of the participants. The lack of logistic regression analysis to adjust for confounding variables is also a limitation of our study. We recommend larger studies with more power to better predict outcomes before generalizing our findings and also explore the role of low molecular weight heparin or plasma exchange in improving the outcomes of children with sepsis.
5.1. Conclusions
Coagulation abnormalities are consistently present in the pathophysiology of the host inflammatory response to infection. Hence, it has been found that D-dimer can be studied as a marker of DIC in sepsis. This study reiterates that D-dimer is a sensitive tool to identify various outcome parameters, though not statistically significant. Higher D-dimer levels at admission may alert the clinician to the possible need for a longer hospital stay, ICU care, and inotrope requirements.