The main finding of this study was that 50.4% of the pediatric surgeries were elective. However, it cannot be well-recognized that how many of these cases could actually be postponed to the age of above three. We can just judge that surgeries such as post-circumcision bleeding, appendicitis, and intussusception are categorized as emergency surgeries while circumcision, for example, is specifically elective surgery. However, regarding other conditions such as axillary or facial masses and herniation, it is unsafe to exactly declare that these surgeries could be postponed. Indeed, since it was a retrospective study, two phrases “elective” or “emergency”, like other children’s data, were extracted from the documents and the suffering condition of the child was not clear at that time. The potential complications due to the anatomic site of the mass and the communication problems of the child should be considered, as well. Additionally, in a few surgeries, determining the proper age for surgery is multifactorial. For example, in hypospadias surgery, it is suggested that, although it is elective surgery, the complication rate increases as the child age increases. Studies show that fistula is more common in surgery at the age of 10 than younger ages (
23). Overall, based on the present study, we cannot claim that, in our hospital, more than half of the children under three undergo unnecessary surgeries and consequently are affected by GA. However, it is quite clear that GA-related neurotoxicity must be more broadly discussed and the conditions regarding pediatric surgery and case selection must be improved. In fact, it should be accepted that GA in young children must be restricted to emergency surgeries and life-treating conditions. We reported these data from our hospital, which is a referral and academic hospital. However, due to the lack of similar studies, we cannot compare our performance with other centers to find out whether we are acting properly or not.
In line with our findings that indicated the need for good communication between anesthesiology departments and other departments, Sedighinejad et al. in a study evaluated the current knowledge and practice of physicians, both specialists and residents, at Guilan academic hospitals regarding GA-related neurotoxicity. They reported that more than half of their participants neither had any idea about GA neurotoxicity nor prevented parents from elective surgeries for their children (
24). Searching the literature, our country, Iran, is not the only place experiencing this problem. Ward et al. in 2015 reported that the current pediatric anesthesia programs in the US could not manage the topic of GA neurotoxicity with non-anesthesia colleagues and parents through good communication. Studies have shown that parents frequently ask about the safe age for GA (
25).
We believe that despite these limitations, this study can be valued because it would enlighten the public to see the importance of this issue and how it hasn’t been well-practiced. Obviously, many more attempts should be made to reach the desired goals.
5.1. Limitations
It was a single-center study, restricted to an academic hospital with two pediatric surgeons. Thus, we have no information about the private hospitals in our province with several surgeons and possibly with different approaches. Furthermore, limitations due to the nature of a retrospective survey should be considered, as well. The investigated factors related to GA exposure in children under three were restricted to those documented in hospital records. Thus, important factors such as parents’ education levels could not be evaluated.