This study demonstrated that 3D CTA showed characteristic distribution of medial calcification and luminal stenosis in patients with HD and symptomatic PAD: the EIA was spared from both medial calcification and luminal stenosis and the prevalence of normal artery in the IIA, SFA and TPA was quite low.
The EIA was spared from both medial calcification and arterial stenosis even in symptomatic patients with HD and PAD. Horimatsu et al. (
6) and Graziani et al. (
12) have indicated that the EIA has vascular calcification or stenosis less frequently in patients with PAD or HD. We speculate that relatively high blood flow, straight pathway, and fewer branches (i.e., inferior epigastric and deep circumferential arteries) of the EIA contribute to its resistance to vascular calcification. By contrast, the IIA with tortuosity and many branching had either medial calcification or luminal stenosis. The IIA, SFA, and TPA with many muscular branches and slower blood flow showed arterial disorders frequently. A previous study indicates that these arteries tend to be stenotic even in the unselected elderly subjects (
13). In another study, SFA is treated by interventional procedures much more frequently than the CIA and EIA in patients on chronic HD (
12). Our results were consistent with these previous studies. In some previous studies, the presence of vascular calcification is found to affect the outcomes of patients with HD or PAD despite the development of interventional techniques and metallic stents (
11,
12,
14). Identifying arterial disorders by 3D CTA may be valuable for planning the revascularization therapies and evaluating arterial stiffness and its complications such as HT, myocardial hypertrophy, and myocardial ischemia on exercise (
1,
6,
14,
15).
This study had limitations. First, we did not include HD patients without symptoms related to PAD or who had undergone revascularization therapies or amputation before CTA. Thus, the exact frequency of PAD or medial calcification associated with HD remains unknown. However, the use of CTA and iodine contrast agents may not be warranted in HD patients without clinical symptoms, for whom ankle brachial index or ultrasonography should be assessed when screening for PAD. Second, we analyzed Radiology reports made on site, but did not interpret 3D CTA images in a blinded manner. The present study was also descriptive and retrospective, which might lead to selection bias. Nonetheless, the present study may reflect the clinical scenario of these patients. Third, a histologic confirmation of medial or intimal calcification was not made. Medial calcification was defined according to a previous study (
11). Finally, because of the retrospective, cross-sectional study design from a single center, the effects of medial calcification or luminal stenosis on the HD patients’ prognosis could not be determined.
In conclusion, the distribution of medial calcification and luminal stenosis characteristic of PAD associated with HD are visualized using 3D CTA. The EIA is spared from medial calcification and luminal stenosis. The IIA, SFA, and TPA tend to show either medial calcification or luminal stenosis. The characteristic distribution may be related to the vascular diameter, pathway, number of branch arteries, and blood flow. Identification of arterial diseases by 3D CTA may assist the planning of revascularization therapies in symptomatic patients with HD and PAD.